I think that the best answer is "c. an incentive to bring their ideas to market" - you can see that through the statement of "<span>the opportunity to profit from their ideas"- an opportunity to profit is an incentive to work and in the case of the creators - to bring their ideas to market.
However, an opportunity to profit is not a guarantee that one will profit - so for example option a) is wrong. </span>
Historically the press has had an adversarial relationship with the government.
The word adversarial here means a relationship that is full of a lot of conflicts, oppositions and anger.
The reason for this is because the press is often charged with revealing or exposing the ills, the weaknesses and the wrongs of the government.
The constitution of the country recognizes the freedom of the press. So it is difficult for most governments to try to control them.
Read more on brainly.com/question/9418556?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
i think it would be england
Answer:
external cause
Explanation:
Elaina is showing a common phenomenon in social psychology:
the attribution to external causes, which means that she assigns the cause of a happening to situations that are external to her, and rather than assessing her performance in terms of her inner characteristics.
She could have also <em>expressed how her feelings and state of mind at that time played a part, but instead, she is making external attributions, like "judges being unfair by giving her all harder words".</em>
The attribution theory in social psychology see how people try to point out to more causes that are in the surroundings or external, and often this influences their motivations and behaviour.
If people make inferences why others behave in a certain way and they refer to the outside then, we speak of external causes.
Social perception and self-perception can have internal, external causes and often we are advised to seek motivations in any of these ways.
