Answer:
Product differentiation and advertising are profitable ventures only when:
the gain in total revenue outweighs the extra cost
Explanation:
When Company XYZ differentiates its product from competitors' through trademarks and other differentiating factors and embarks on advertising, it must watch out for cost overrun. The undertaking for the product differentiation and advertising should be able to generate more revenue than the costs. This will make Company XYZ determine that its differentiation and advertising make economic meaning by producing positive NPV.
Answer:
Direct labor rate variance= $69,579 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Standard labor-hours per unit of output 9.0 hours
Standard labor rate= $15.10 per hour
Actual hours worked= 8,100 hours
Actual total labor cost= $191,880
To calculate the direct labor rate variance, we need to use the following formula:
Direct labor rate variance= (Standard Rate - Actual Rate)*Actual Quantity
Actual rate= 191,880/8,100= $23.69 per hour
Direct labor rate variance= (15.10 - 23.69)*8,100
Direct labor rate variance= $69,579 unfavorable
Answer:
Who is the franchisor? McDonald's
Who is the franchisee? C.B. Management Inc.
In a franchise relationship, the <u>franchisee</u> is economically dependent on the <u>franchisor's</u> business system.
The franchise relationship is defined by the <u>contract</u>.
Did C.B. Management, Inc.’s failure to make a payment due more than thirty days earlier constitute a breach of the franchise contract? YES
Why? A) the contract provided McDonald's could terminate the contract when a payment was more than 30 days late.
Did the contract provide that the acceptance of a late payment waived McDonald's right to terminate for late payments? NO
What does an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing require? That the parties act <u>reasonably</u>.
Did McDonald's act of accepting late payments in the past transform McDonald's right to terminate into a discretionary decision governed by the standard of good faith and fair dealing in the future? NO
Why? Which one of these reasons is not correct? B) the actions of the parties control this issue.
A court would likely find for <u>McDonald’s</u>
Answer: increased, trade- offs, marginal thinking, small.
Explanation:
According to the passage, The coach is weighing a slightly<u> increased </u>risk of losing against a slightly decreased risk of injury to the star quarterback. This weighing o<u>f trade-offs </u>is an example of <u>marginal thinking,</u> because the star quarterback was in for most of the game, and the coach's decision concerns <u>small </u>shifts in probabilities with the game nearly over.
