1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
EastWind [94]
2 years ago
6

Which is true about criminal law?

Law
1 answer:
nikdorinn [45]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The statement that is true about criminal law is It involves wrongs against society.

Explanation:

Lets use process of elimination!

The first sentence states It provides the injured party with a remedy.

This would be personal injury case, not a criminal case.

The second sentence states It involves wrongs against individuals.

This would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.

The third sentence states It tries to return the injured party to the same position before injury.

This again would be a civil matter, not a criminal case.

Which leaves the fourth and final sentence. It states It involves wrongs against society.

This is the correct answer because if you did something to an individual, it would be a civil matter, but the wrongs against society would be like commiting a homicide, robery, grand theft, assult, arson, kidnapping, etc.

Hopefully this helps!!

Let me know if you still need help or if you have any questions!

You might be interested in
Who found the body of JonBenet?
Alborosie

Answer:

A long handwritten ransom note was found in the home. Her father, John, found the girl's body in the basement of their house about seven hours after she had been reported missing. She had sustained a broken skull from a blow to the head and had been strangled; a garrote was found tied around her neck.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Econ may someone answer please and thank you
Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

B

Explanation: I don't know, I mean it seems sensible but i want to be a lawyer when i grow up and it looks like the disadvantage would be conflicts because say both owners decide on selling it, and owner A wants to sell it for lets say $450 and owner B wants to sell it for $750 that right there would be a conflict and could lead to in some cases a break of the contract they signed which can lead to court and all that stuff but the advantage would be that you could have many expert partners like the answer says and they could correct you on your mistakes, lets go back to the imaginary problem i made up. Owner A wants to sell the object for $450 dollars and owner B wants to sell it for $750 but Owner A is a more experienced and shows owner B that it was worth that but its been used so therefore you should lower the price and it would be easier to sell. (sorry if i sound stupid I wouldn't recommend using that as the answer but if you decide to please tell me if i'm right or wrong also I'm 12 so...)

4 0
3 years ago
Need help please....<br> Government
Vlad [161]

Answer

@misterking_59 add me i have the same quiz

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What key questions should be asked during an interview with an informant?
Monica [59]

Answer:

Introduction: Before beginning the interview introduce yourself and your

project. As a general rule the introduction you write should do the following: 1)

help establish the purpose for the interview; 2) explain who is involved in the

process (community partnership members); 3) establish credibility for the

interview and yourself as the interviewer; 4) explain why their cooperation is

important in collecting the information you need; and 5) explain what will

happen with the collected information and how the community will benefit.

• Key questions: Draft five to ten questions important to getting the information

you have set out to collect. The key questions should be designed in order to

elicit more revealing information about your community issue or problem. Ask

questions that draw upon the informant's expertise and unique viewpoint.

• Probing questions: Probing questions encourage participants to reflect more

deeply on the meaning of their comments. These questions are also useful at

getting people to think about the cause or root of the problem you are

investigating.

• Closing question: Provide an opportunity for the key informant to give any

additional information or comments. Also ask the key informants for their

recommendations or solutions in addressing the problem.

• Summary: If time permits, quickly summarize the major comments heard

throughout the interview and ask informants if you covered all the major points.

Ask them if there is anything else they would like to tell you that you have not

asked them. Finally, thank them for their time.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What two questions do justices ask about a case?
IrinaVladis [17]
They usually do legal research to know what type of questions to ask it all depends on the case
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A Resolução 1.374/11 em seu artigo 1º estabelece nova redação a Estrutura Conceitual para Elaboração e Divulgação de Relatório C
    12·1 answer
  • Difinição Violencia domestica?
    9·1 answer
  • A person who studies of the causes and effects of disease is
    5·1 answer
  • Under which circumstance is an appeals court most likely to rule that a defendant has been denied the right to assistance of
    9·1 answer
  • In Florida,what is a CTSO in a relation to career academies in secondary schools
    8·1 answer
  • Theory should be tested against___ to measure its accuracy and value
    11·1 answer
  • This branch has Congress, the House of Representatives and the
    6·2 answers
  • Quá độ lên chủ nghĩa xã hội bỏ qua tư bản chủ nghĩa.
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these pretrial notions can be filed only by a defense attorney, and not by a prosecutor?
    10·1 answer
  • Permitting rental agencies to refuse to rent apartments to families with children would violate what kind of due process?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!