1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alik [6]
2 years ago
12

Iron metal can be obtained from iron ore, iron (III) oxide. When the iron (III) oxide is reacted with carbon monoxide gas it for

ms iron metal and carbon dioxide gas. If 75.0 grams of iron (III) oxide are reacted with 50.0 g of carbon monoxide gas, what is
the theoretical yield of iron metal that can be produced?
Equation: ?
Limiting Reactant: ?
Excess: ?
Grams of target product produced:
Chemistry
1 answer:
ahrayia [7]2 years ago
4 0

The theoretical yield of iron metal is 42.3 g

The equation for the reaction is:

Fe₂O₃ + 3CO → 2Fe + 3CO₂

Since, all of the carbon monoxide was consumed during the reaction, then carbon monoxide is the limiting reactant

Thus, iron (III) oxide is the excess reactant

<h3>Stoichiometry </h3>

From the question, we are to determine the theoretical yield of iron metal

First, we will write the balanced chemical equation for the reaction

The balanced chemical equation for the reaction is

Fe₂O₃ + 3CO → 2Fe + 3CO₂

This means

1 mole of iron(III) oxide reacts with 3 moles of carbon monoxide to produce 2 moles of iron metal and 3 moles of carbon dioxide gas.

Now, to determine the theoretical yield of iron metal

First, we will determine the number of moles of each reactant present

  • For iron(III) oxide

Mass = 75.0 grams

Molar mass = 159.69 g/mol

Using the formula,

Number \ of \ moles = \frac{Mass}{Molar\ mass}

Then,

Number of mole of Fe₂O₃ present = \frac{75.0}{159.69}

Number of mole of Fe₂O₃ present = 0.46966 mole

  • For carbon monoxide

Mass = 50.0 g

Molar mass = 44.01 g

Then,

Number of moles of CO₂ present = \frac{50.0}{44.01}

Number of moles of CO₂ present = 1.136105 moles

Now,

If 1 mole of iron(III) oxide reacts with 3 moles of carbon monoxide to produce 2 moles of iron metal

Then,

0.378702 mole of iron(III) oxide will react with 1.136105 moles of carbon monoxide to produce 0.757403 moles of iron metal

Therefore, the number of moles of iron metal that would be produced is 0.757403 moles

Now, for the mass of the iron metal

Using the formula

Mass = Number of moles × Molar mass

Atomic mass of iron metal = 55.845 g/mol

Then,

Mass of iron metal that would be produced = 0.757403 × 55.845

Mass of iron metal that would be produced = 42.29717 g

Mass of iron metal that would be produced ≅ 42.3 g

Hence, the theoretical yield of iron metal is 42.3 g

The equation for the reaction is:

Fe₂O₃ + 3CO → 2Fe + 3CO₂

Since, all of the carbon monoxide was consumed during the reaction, then carbon monoxide is the limiting reactant

Thus, iron (III) oxide is the excess reactant

Learn more on Stoichiometry here: brainly.com/question/6061451

You might be interested in
What is the best definition of energy?
tatuchka [14]

Answer:

C

this answer needs to be 20 characters long

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I have a question can someone answer these questions for me please?
Kitty [74]
1. C
2. E
3. A
4. B
5. D
I hope that helps <3
8 0
2 years ago
What does the atomic number of an element specify? what does the atomic number of an element specify?
GREYUIT [131]
The atomic number of an element identifies the number of protons and electrons.
8 0
3 years ago
240 g of water (specific heat = 4.186 J/g°C, initial temperature = 20°C) is mixed with an
ivolga24 [154]
The answer for this would be 69.6
3 0
3 years ago
Instructions
ivann1987 [24]

Answer:

I got a 100 with this, sorry if this is not what you want just trying to help

Explanation:

1. This experiment was to find how mass and speed effect KE. This is important because if you were in a situation where you needed something to go higher, you would know to add more or less of mass/speed.  

To test mass, we filled the bean bag with a certain amount of water, then dropped it. After, you recorded how high it made the bean bag go. The same with speed, but same amount in the bottle, just dropped from different heights.  

My hypothesis is when you have more mass, the KE will be greater. This is also the same with speed, if it is dropped from a higher place, the bean bag will launch farther than the last time.  

2. Data I collected from the lab was like my hypothesis explained. When the height of the bottle increased, it made the bean bag go higher than the last. And I tested 4 different masses, 0.125 kg, 0.250kg, 0.375kg and 0.500kg. Each time the bean bag went higher on a larger mass.  

A lot of times on the speed test, the bean bag would go higher than the bottle drop point, but not every time. Also, when it was dropped from the same height each time, some results varied quite a bit, like when it was dropped from 1.28 the results were 1.14 then 1.30 1.30. Mass on the other hand was all in the same number range, only once the numbers were a bit off from each other.  

3.  Some formulas I used were KE= ½ mv^2 and Ht v^2/2g. The first was to calculate the kinetic energy of an object, m=mass v=speed. Second was for finding out what height I needed to drop something to reach a certain speed, Ht=Height and g= Gravitational Acceleration of 9.8 m/s^2.  

I used these to figure out tables that showed relationships between different things like mass and KE or speed and height. The whole time I was doing the lab, my data was going up, when there was more mass/speed there were higher values in the table.  

This means that my hypothesis at the beginning was correct, more of m/s means KE will increase proportionally because they are all linear. I found it surprising when the bean bag height went over the water bottle drop mark.  

4.     To conclude, my hypothesis matched my data. The data values went up when more mass or speed was added. This means if I were in a situation where I needed more kinetic energy for something, I would know to increase mass or the speed of the object giving it energy.  

The reason that this hypothesis is correct is when you have more mass, you have more energy. So, when you drop let's say a baseball, it isn’t that heavy so it would only launch the bean bag so far. But a bowling ball is very heavy and has lots of energy when falling because of that, it would make the bean bag go very high.  

To make this experiment better, I would use a smoother material for the lever so energy wouldn’t be lost by friction from wood rubbing together. Also, maybe a scanner or video camera to more accurately record how far the bean bag went. All of these would help the lab get more precise results, maybe they could be used in a future lab.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Annabeth has 7.2 cups of cookie batter, represented by this model. If each cookie uses 0.45 cup of batter, how many cookies can
    14·2 answers
  • A cylindrical specimen of some metal alloy having an elastic modulus of 126 GPa and an original cross-sectional diameter of 3.4
    6·1 answer
  • 3. Under certain conditions, oxygen gas (O2) has a density of 0.00134 g/mL. Find the volume occupied by 250.0 g of O2 under the
    5·2 answers
  • Brainliest if answered in the next 5m
    9·2 answers
  • PLEASANSWERSOONThe elements on the Periodic Table that we use today are arranged by
    7·1 answer
  • 20.0 g of Nitrogen is produced when oxygen gas reacts with NO gas. 29.8 L of oxygen is required at STP to produce this 20.0 g of
    11·1 answer
  • PLS help its not that hard but I don't understand it. Its science not chemistry but they don't have science.
    13·2 answers
  • What separates the inner planets from the outer planets in our solar system?
    10·1 answer
  • Explain how convection currents drive tectonic plate movement. In your answer, describe the role of energy transfer in the movem
    15·2 answers
  • Find the number of Fe2O3 moles needed to release 12 moles of CO2 . ​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!