I believe the answer is: B. <span>It denies enforceability to certain contracts that are not in writing
Statute of frauds stated that to be legally binding, an agreement should be materialized in a contract that filled with a specific obligation that must be met by each party under the circumstances that they both agreed on. If this writing do not exist, technically we wouldn't have any ground to sue if the other party failed to fulfill the obligation.</span>
Every time we watch a television commercial, read a pop-up ad on the internet, or listen to a political speech, someone is using "Persuasion" to try to influence what we believe or how we will behave.
<h3>What is Persuasive communication?</h3>
Persuasion is the act of delivering arguments in order to influence, motivate, and change your audience. Persuasion can be implied or explicit.
Some features regarding the Persuasive communication are-
- Motivation entails using force, a trigger, as well as enough influence to effect change.
- Persuasion is the technique that drives the audience to modify their attitudes and behavior, embrace your point of view, and react to your arguments.
- The goal is to influence your audience's views, attitudes, judgments, and values.
- Because the audience's prejudice in judgment may be present, plan a few good points so that they can respond to and comprehend your topic.
- If the audience believes that shortage or an issue exists, they will seek solutions.
To know more about the Persuasive communication, here
brainly.com/question/14499660
#SPJ4
I believe that is b correct me if I'm wrong
Miranda v. Arizona is the U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.
The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.
the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890
#SPJ4
