$0.05m + $50>55
0.05 per minute plus $50 per month for the plan less than $55
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
In simple words, under such tax reforms the government is intending to raise indirect taxes which will lead to higher prices of certain goods and is also declining taxes on savings. Both of these steps will work as an incentive for individuals to save more.
However a big majority of community is stating that this will only lead to more burden on the weaker section due to higher prices of commodities and will eventually result in lower standard of living for certain individuals.
Sole proprietorships are often owned by financial institutuins
Answer:
The proper IFRS presentation is:
d. Listing current assets before noncurrent assets, and listing Current Liabilities before Retained Earnings
Explanation:
The above listing is in the order of liquidity, especially of current assets and noncurrent assets. This listing shows all the current assets before the noncurrent assets with Cash, Accounts Receivable, etc following that order for the listing of current assets. And the more permanent assets are listed last. Similarly, for the Liabilities and Equity side, the Current Liabilities are listed first before the Noncurrent Liabilities followed by Equity (Share Capital and Retained Earnings) in that order.
Answer:
Consider the following explanation
Explanation:
Context
Game theory involves two players. They have more than one option to decide. Pay off from each options adopted by two players are available. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their own return. But for optimizing their decision, they have to consider the action of his rival.
In this problem, two players are firm A and firm B. They have two strategies low output and high output. The strategies of firm a are measured in rows and for firm B in columns. They have to select a strategy which will maximize their payy off. Each cell has two pay offs. First one is for Firm A and second one is for firm B.
1. Dominant strategy is a strategy which will always give higher payoffs in comparison with pay off of other strategies. Consider first strategy of firm 1. If it adopts strategy of low output, then firm 2 can also adopt either strategy of low output or high output. In that case pay off of firm 1 will be 300 or 200.
Alteratively if firm 1 adopts high output then pay offs are 200 or 75. 200 is earned if firm B also go for low productivity. It is 75 if firm B adopts high productivity.
Now compare two payoffs side by side. Note that firm A has higher pay off in low output [300,200] in comparison with the pay off of high output [200,75]. So whatever strategy firm B adopts, Firm A will always go for low production. So low production strategy of firm A dominates high production strategy.
Same result is not observed for firm B. Pay off from low production strategy of firm B is [ 250,75]. Pay off from high production strategy are [100,100]. Now compare the two. If Firm A go for low production, then firm B will select low production. It will give pay off 250. Similarly when firm A decides for high production, then firm will also decide for high production. It will maximize its pay off. Amount is 100. Thus no strategy dominates for firm B.
