1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
den301095 [7]
2 years ago
15

“Law is not a factual statement (description is not in the nature of law); it is rather a prescriptive tool which purports to sh

ape human behavior in the future.” Explain.​
Law
1 answer:
Ugo [173]2 years ago
8 0

According to what is expressed in the fragment, it can be inferred that the purpose of the sentence is to clarify that laws are created to modify human behavior.

<h3>What is a law?</h3>

A law is a term to refer to a norm or rule of society that citizens must comply with in order to live in harmony with others.

Laws are one of the oldest social tools in the world because they guarantee that citizens have a more controlled behavior with respect to others. Additionally, this provides them with some obligations that they must fulfill to belong to the social group.

According to the above, it can be inferred that the fragment refers to the fact that laws are an adequate tool to modify human behavior according to the needs of society.

Learn more about law in: brainly.com/question/6590381

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
One of the most common research methods in criminology is what
sdas [7]

Answer:

The NCVS uses surveys to collect data and this is one of the more common research methods used in criminology. Surveys involve giving a questionnaire to a group of individuals or respondents. Surveys can be given face-to-face, mailed to the respondents, or given over the phone.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer,
zepelin [54]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

it reduces trust for the same reason we dont like Russians spying on us.

4 0
3 years ago
What is an example of a state granting more civil rights to its citizens than the federal government does?
Karolina [17]

Answer:

"It is a fair summary of constitutional history that the landmarks of our liberties have ... the center of one of many national civil liberties disputes in the late 20th century. ... For example, the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights guarantees citizens the ... Government, then, cannot interfere in an individual's freedom of worship.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did people protesting the stay-at-home order cite the 2nd amendment? Isn't that the right to bear arms?
Katen [24]

Answer:

the 2nd amendment is the right to bear arms.

Explanation:

they might have cited the right to bear arms because when the government is seen as out of control the people can take over. so I'm guessing that because they see the stay at home order as unfair they want to protest and have guns. but I'm not 100% sure this is right. I just hope this helps

5 0
3 years ago
To which of the following would Kant and Nozick agree?
soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

Although Robert Nozick did not consider himself to be primarily a political philosopher, he is best known for his contributions to it. Undoubtedly, Nozick’s work in epistemology and metaphysics (especially with respect to free will and the “closest continuer” theory of personal identity) has had a significant impact on those fields. However, it was the publication of his first book, Anarchy, State and Utopia (1974) that revitalized the political right-wing and set off a firestorm of critical replies and commentaries. While Nozick’s accomplishments reach far beyond the confines of political philosophy, it is safe to say that most recognize him for his work on attempting to provide a justification for the state, setting the limits of government, and trying to convince us that accepting his minimal state could foster a framework for a constellation of communities constituting a sort of utopia.

Anarchy, State and Utopia can also be seen as a critical response to John Rawls’ Theory of Justice, which was published just three years earlier and was considered to be the most robust and sophisticated defense of liberal egalitarianism. Although many credit Rawls for single-handedly rekindling interest in political philosophy, this is likely overstated praise. There is little doubt that Nozick’s systematic criticism of Rawls’ theory of justice and establishment of a rival political theory in Anarchy, State and Utopia also played a major role in bring significant attention back to political philosophy.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • _____ signs tell you what roads, cities, and services are nearby.
    14·2 answers
  • Why do think capital punishment exists?
    8·1 answer
  • The federal court system hears what types of cases
    6·2 answers
  • ¿Dónde se encuentra el hilo/la conexión en el DESASTRE AMBIENTAL/ Y LA CONCIENCIA INDIVIDUAL?
    10·1 answer
  • Robert very much wants to hire Jacqueline because she is African American and Beck ‘n’ Call does not have a large enough number
    6·1 answer
  • Freeee pointshuyinbjvliun
    8·1 answer
  • Hey <br>anyone bored now ?? ​
    15·2 answers
  • (ASAP 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST) To what extent, if any, do jury trials ensure due process as stated in the Constitution and Bil
    9·1 answer
  • What is photosynthesis<br><br><br>​
    9·2 answers
  • Are federal agencies required to have rcr policies
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!