Answer:
B and C makes sense but mostly B
Explanation:
Answer:
Positive punishment is the introduction of a(n) aversive stimulus following a behavior and negative punishment is the withdrawal of a(n) pleasant stimulus following a behavior.
Explanation:
Positive punishment aims at reducing to the barest minimum the amount of wrong behavior exhibited by an individual and ensure it is not repeated. It is more effective when the act and the punishment are commensurate. For instance, when a child is destructive his/her parents may stop him/her from playing with toys or video games. Also, In a classroom, students who fail to do their assignments may be asked to kneel in front of the class for hours or given more assignments to do.
Negative Punishment, on the other hand, involves the removal of a wrong behavior by eradicating a stimulus. This type of punishment is more effective if it is consistently applied. For instance, a child who refuses to do his/her house chores may be barred from watching his/her favorite television show.
Answer:
¡Por supuesto! Inglés medio (en los sentidos 'forma de pensar, opinión', 'declaración de castigo de la corte' y 'esencia (de un escrito')): a través del francés antiguo del latín sententia 'opinión', de sentire 'sentir, ser de la opinión'.
¿Esto ayuda en absoluto?
Explanation:
Answer:
In simple words, The exploitation of consistency influenced quite well how frequently children became able to halt fulfillment and how longer the fulfillment could be postponed.
By contrast, atmosphere manipulation doubled waiting periods in the stable situation and cut in half the period in the inaccurate scenario. Earlier studies which examined the impact of learning waiting techniques to children reported fewer results, the authors claim.
