Answer:
This is an opinion!
Explanation:
Okay, so we all know the Articals of Confederation were too weak and it made the government crumble. Shay's Rebellion is what proved this. So it's obvious the government needs to change, but should you keep the Articals?? That is your opinion.
If completely scrap:
"Hello, my fellow delegates. We all know the Articals of Confederation is not the best work. We can't fund the army, states are going against each other, and the people are all rather poor. There is no way we can fix this without starting over! There is no way we can stand by this without our government crumbling. We all worked so hard to have life liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, but we can only have that if our government is stronger."
If just revise:
"Hello, my fellow delegates. We all know the Articals of Confederation is not our best work, but we can't just scrap it completely! We only need to edit it. It has it's pros, like declaring war! We can't have too strong of a government, or else all we fought for would be for nothing! The Articals were thoughtfully written out, and just scrapping it would be a complete waste."
Either one is fine, you can use whichever! Try rewriting it in your own words, and be creative. Hope this helps! :))
Answer: E - year only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, trim output
Explanation: From the above question, we are looking for the best constructed sentence among the options given.
Looking through all the options, A and B with the phrase ...'but only if' is wrong.
Options C and D has some grammatical issues at the end of each statement which made them both not correct.
The only option we are left with is the option E which states that 'year only if non-OPEC nations, including Norway, Mexico, and Russia, trim output' is correct.
Answer:
A door opened onto the street, but windows always faced the courtyard for extra privacy.
. Drains were laid under the streets
Explanation:
They would win the lawsuit because they are entitled to theyre own opinion and should never have been fired for it in the first place. so ive narrowed it down to the top 2 because i know for a fact the company wont win and they were fired without due process and number two is not in the constitution so it is the first one .
the employees will win because the constitution prevents them from being fired without due process.
