1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikitadnepr [17]
2 years ago
7

Which principle suggests that there is no way to discriminate between right and wrong in morality? The principle of suggests tha

t there is no way to discriminate between right and wrong in morality.
Business
1 answer:
Wewaii [24]2 years ago
6 0

The principle principle suggests that there is no way to discriminate between right and wrong in morality is called ethical relativism.

<h3>What is ethical relativism?</h3>

Ethical relativism share the view that what is wrong to one, may be right to the other. This means a wrong or right action is dependent on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced.

Hence, the principle principle suggests that there is no way to discriminate between right and wrong in morality is called ethical relativism.

Learn more about ethical relativism here: brainly.com/question/11328803

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
The account balances of Wilson Towing Service at June 30, 2016, follow:Equipment $12,950Office supplies 1,000Notes payable 4,500
andre [41]

Answer:

Wilson Towing Service

Income Statement

For the month ending June 30, 2016

Service revenue        $12,500

Salaries expense      ($2,500)

<u>Rent expense               ($500)</u>

Operating profit         $9,500

The income statement tells us how much profit/loss did a business make during a certain period of time. In this case, the operating profit was $9,500. In order to calculate net income we would need to subtract taxes but we are not given the tax rate or the taxes due.

8 0
3 years ago
Alex, brad, and carl are partners. the profit and rule sharing rule between them is 4:3:3 in the alphabetical order. the partner
goblinko [34]

If i understand your question properly, you want to determine how much each partner wiil have based on the sharing ratio.

Answer:

Alex- $40,000

Brad- $30,000

Carl- $30,000

Explanation:

For a net loss of $100,000 shared between partners in the ratio 4:3:3, the value of each partner's ratio can be calculated as seen below.

Step 1: Add the ratios

i.e; 4 + 3 + 3 = 10

Step 2: Calculate the value of each ratio in $100,000 using te formula

(ratio value ÷ total ratio) × $100,000

For Alex, we have

(4 ÷ 10) × $100,000

= 0.4 × $100,000

= $40,000

For Brad, we have

(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000

= 0.3 × $100,000

= $30,000

For Carl, we have

(3 ÷ 10) × $100,000

= 0.3 × $100,000

= $30,000

N.B: To confirm if the value of each ratio is correct, you can add up the values to see if it makes $100,000. If it doesn't, then the calculatio is wrong.

Adding the value of the ratios, we have $40,000 + $30,000 + $30,000 = $100,000.

i hope this helps

6 0
3 years ago
PA5.
daser333 [38]

Answer:

Using weighted average method

Statement of equivalent units

                                                   Material    Conversion

                                                    Units         Units

Units transferred out                   19,000       19,000

Add: Closing work-in-progress   <u> 6,000 </u>      <u> 1,800</u>

Average divisor                            <u> 25,000 </u>    <u>20,800</u>

                        Computation of cost per unit

                                                              Material   Conversion

                                                                   $               $

Cost of beginning work-in-progress   10,000      19,000

Cost added                                           <u> 50,000 </u>   <u>112,248</u>

Total cost                                               <u> 60,000 </u>   <u>131,248</u>

Material cost per unit = <u>$60,000</u>

                                         25,000 units

                                    = $2.40 per unit

Conversion cost per unit = <u>$131,248</u>

                                            20,800 units    

                                          = $6.31 per unit

 Value of units transferred out

  Material = 19,000 x $2.40  = $45,600

  Conversion = 19,000 x $6.31 = $119,890

  Value of closing work-in-progress

 Material = 6,000 x $2.40 = $14,400

  Conversion = 1,800 x $6.31 = 11,358

           

Explanation:

In this case, we need to prepare statement of equivalent units in order to ascertain the average divisor. The average divisor is the sum of units transferred out and closing work-in-progress. Then, we will obtain the total cost of material and conversion, which is the aggregate of cost of opening work-in-progress and cost of units added. We will also calculate the cost per unit, which is total cost of material and conversion divided  by average divisor. Finally, the units transferred  and ending work-in-progress will be valued at unit cost of material and conversion.                                

8 0
4 years ago
Great Lakes Packing has two bond issues outstanding. The first issue has a coupon rate of 3.50 percent, a par value of $1,000 pe
katrin [286]

Answer:

2.9652%

Explanation:

to determine the cost of debt we must use the FMV of the bonds plus the YTM:

first bond:

FMV = 1.09 x $1,000 = $1,090 x 3,600 bonds = $3,924,000

YTM = {C + [(F - P)/n]} / [(F + P)/2] = {17.5 + [(1000 - 1090)/16]} / [(1000 + 1090)/2] = (17.5 - 5.625) / 1045 = 1.136% x 2 = 2.27% annual

second bond:

FMV = 0.95 x $2,000 = $1,900 x 3,950 bonds = $7,505,000

YTM = {C + [(F - P)/n]} / [(F + P)/2] = {59.4 + [(2000 - 1900)/42]} / [(2000 + 1900)/2] = (59.4 + 2.38) / 1950 = 3.168% x 2 = 6.34% annual

total debt = $3,924,000 + $7,505,000 = $11,429,000

weighted average after tax cost of debt:

{($3,924,000/$11,429,000 x 2.27%) + ($7,505,000/$11,429,000 x 6.34%)} x (1 - 0.40) = (0.779% + 4.163%) x 0.6 = 4.942% x 0.6 = 2.9652%

6 0
4 years ago
The consumption schedule shows a.that households consume more when interest rates are low. b.that consumption depends primarily
Lelechka [254]

Answer: The consumption schedule shows the amounts households intend to consume at various possible levels of aggregate income.

Explanation: Consumption function, in economics, the relationship between consumer spending and the various factors determining it. At the household or family level, these factors may include income, wealth, expectations about the level and riskiness of future income or wealth, interest rates, age, education, and family size.

A consumption schedule is a table of numbers showing the relation between consumption expenditures and income for the household sector. The income measure commonly used is national income or disposable income. Occasionally a measure of aggregate production, such as gross domestic product, is used instead.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Moody Farms just paid a dividend of $3.25 on its stock. The growth rate in dividends is expected to be a constant 5 percent per
    7·1 answer
  • The main reason that firms outsource is that: low-wage workers in other countries are more productive than are u.s. workers. hir
    9·1 answer
  • Governments may intervene in a market economy in order to
    11·2 answers
  • Explain the difference between implicit and explicit costs
    11·1 answer
  • Schrute Farm Sales buys portable generators for and sells them for He pays a sales commission of​ 5% of sales revenue to his sal
    11·1 answer
  • At the broadest and vaguest level, cost-benefit analysis may be regarded simply as______________.a. systematic thinking about de
    13·2 answers
  • Casey earns $150 a week and consumes only fish and shrimp. The price of fish is $3 a pound and the price of shrimp is $5 a pound
    15·1 answer
  • If you were worried about your money being safe from financial disaster in your bank, which new deal program would calm your fea
    12·1 answer
  • Western Electronics (WE) is reviewing the following data relating to a new equipment proposal: Net initial investment outlay Aft
    6·1 answer
  • Match the term with its definition Question 2 options: a method of advertising or selling that uses false claims to lure people
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!