Which scatterplot demonstrates the strongest relationship between two quantitative variables?

1 answer:

5 0

The scatterplot demonstrates the strongest relationship is, a graph has x on the x-axis, and y on the y-axis. Points increase loosely together.

<h3>Correlation coefficient of scatterplot</h3>

The correlation coefficient of scatterplot is used to demonstrate the relationship between variables.

When two variables increases together, they are said to have positive correlation.

When one is increasing and another is decreasing, they are said to have negative correlation.

When most of data points form a straight line or lies close to the straight line, it indicates strong linear correlation.

From the given options;

Option A, zero correlation
Option B, less than 1
Option C, 1 or greater than 1
Option D, -1 or less than 1

Thus, the scatterplot demonstrates the strongest relationship between two quantitative variables is option C, "a graph has x on the x-axis, and y on the y-axis. Points increase loosely together".

The complete question is below:

A. A graph has x on the x-axis, and y on the y-axis. Points are scattered throughout the graph.

B. A graph has x on the x-axis, and y on the y-axis. Points curve up and then down in a line.

C. A graph has x on the x-axis, and y on the y-axis. Points increase loosely together.

D. A graph has x on the x-axis, and y on the y-axis. Points decrease loosely together.

Learn more about scatterplot here: brainly.com/question/6592115

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Ry owns a commercial building and leased his premises to John to conduct a bakery business. Under the lease contract, John is ob

Nata [24]

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

The Issue : Gary being the lessor that leased his commercial property to John to conduct bakery business with an obligation to repair modified or damaged parts if any after lease term. However, John couldnt repair the same but paid $3,100 to Gary to cover the repair expenses.

The Legislation : The required Provision says that lessee is reponsible to keep the premises in good condition and to handover back to the lessor in the same condition as it was in the beginning of the lease period except normal wear and tear. Here damage to the building was not due to passage of time or Act of God . It was due to installation of Machinery and fixtures in the building by the lessee.

According to Polster, Inc. v. Swing, tenant was reponsible to repair the damage to the drop ceiling, ceiling tiles, interior walls, front door sill and jamb as it was not normal wear and tear.

Also in the case of Churchill Forge, Inc. v. Brown, there is no unjust in requiring a tenant to reimburse the expenses to landlord. As a result cost will shift to the tenant/lessee as the case may be.

In Conclusion : Thus it is the responsibilty of John to repair the property or else to reimburse the entire expenses incurred to Gary to put the building in good shape other than for normal wear and tear.

Here , the installing of machinery and fixtures should be considered as capital expenditure as lonterm benefit is determined. However, repairs at the end of the lease period will be categorised as revenue expenditure and considered in Profit & loss account for the purpose of tax.

4 0

3 years ago

What was the charge of the 1807 indictment by the man who was chosen as Vice President on February 17, 1801, by the House of Rep

anzhelika [568]

Jefferson is the answer i belive

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How does the cartoonist use exaggeration in this cartoon to create meaning.

Nikitich [7]

Answer:

Tone