Statistical summaries of psychotherapy outcome studies indicate that no single form of therapy proves consistently superior to the others.
<h3>
What is the efficacy of therapy?</h3>
- Client satisfaction with therapy's efficacy is often high.
- The majority of clients are happy with how well therapy works.
- Tend to overestimate the effectiveness of their psychotherapy.
- Psychotherapy is more effective than medication at preventing relapse and is just as effective at treating depression.
- For some individuals, the two treatments—psychotherapy and medication—will work better together than they would separately.
- Efficacy is the ability of a treatment to produce a specific result, presuming perfect patient compliance and successful completion of the treatment.
To learn more about the efficacy of therapy refer to:
brainly.com/question/2341688
#SPJ4
<span>The Intolerable Acts not only attacked the economic rights of people in the Massachusetts colony, but also removed their system of self-rule and representative government. The Intolerable Acts closed the port of Boston to imports and exports, appointed a military governor, barred town meetings, and prevented the election of local officials and the selection of jurors. Although colonists viewed earlier tax acts and acts to control trade as unconstitutional, this act actually deprived them of their civil rights. The Magna Carta and British Bill of Rights of 1689 indicate that the King is not above the law, and that certain civil rights are granted to British subjects to ensure that the King does not become to powerful. Among these rights are the right to trial by a jury of one's peers, and the power of taxation resting in the hands of an elected body. Both of these rights were removed with the tax act. The colonists had no form of economic or political defense against the King's absolute rule in Massachusetts.</span>
The conclusion was made that the longer children are institutionalised, the harder it becomes for them to form attachments.
<u>The answer is: </u>
The warlords were a problem for the Zhou dynasty because the Zhou dynasty was never an entirely unified realm and the local warlords became less identified with the Zhou king and more with their allocated territories.
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>The Zhou court extended its power by granting authority to members of the royal family and in some cases to favoured local warlords, who established confined forts supported by garrison troops. In some cases, local warlords were accepted as Zhou supporters. The warlords became a problem when they challenged the Zhou order and weren’t quickly dealt with by the army. The ruling class was mainly unified by kinship ties. Family relations were strenghthened by arranged marriages where no kinship links actually existed. In this way, the local lords were expected to accept the authority of the king as the head of the Dynasty. </em>
<em>As time went on, the kinship ties were no longer there and the local warlords became less identified with the Zhou king and more with their allocated territories. This tendency was very strong in larger peripheral states. Regional leaders started to ignore their duties to the Zhou court and also started fighting among themselves by the 9th century BCE.</em>
