They helped the wounded men/ soldiers
Answer:d. think about themselves and the social world
Explanation:
it refers to how people look at themselves and the social world in how people behave
The answer is option D "Republican Party." Because of the fight over slavery as a result of it was the <span>Republican Party. There are two parties that are in battle with each other the democrats and the republicans both have there separate views on the government and how to government should be.
Hope this helps!
</span>
Answer:
cross-sectional design
Explanation:
Cross-sectional design: In psychological research, the term "cross-sectional design" is determined as one of the types of "observational study design". While conducting a cross-sectional study design, researcher, investigator, or an experimenter tends to measure the exposures and different outcomes in given study participants or subjects at a specific point in time.
In other words, the cross-sectional study design measures different participants at one point in time.
In the question above, the given statement represents that cross-sectional design was used in the given study.
Answer:
Democracy itself is defined through the concept of institution. A democracy, Przeworski told us, is possible when the relevant political forces can find institutions that give a reasonable guarantee that their interests will not be affected in an extremely adverse way in democratic competition, that is, when interests are subjected to institutionalized uncertainty. (1986). Trust in institutions is closely linked to political culture. Almond and Verba in The Civic Culture: political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (1963) in a study carried out in 1959, they detect that in what they call a modern society there is much more participation, the key for them would be in the political culture. This refers to the attitude of individuals towards the political system and the role they play as individuals within it. Both attitudes, according to Almond and Verba, can be appreciated through certain patterns of orientation towards the political objects of a nation. These patterns can be of four forms: political orientation, which refers to the internalization of the objects of the political system and the relationships between these objects: the cognitive orientation of the system, which refers to the knowledge of what there is, for example the results of public policy; affective orientation, which focuses on feelings towards the political system, its roles, and functioning; and finally, evaluative orientation, which unites the elements of the previous orientations and allows generating evaluative criteria. Trust in institutions permeates these three levels of political orientation. Finally, Frederick C. Turner and John D. Martz (1997) have analyzed the case of Latin America, where the trust of citizens in institutions is an essential factor for the consolidation of democracy. Ludolfo Paramio (1999) argues that party identification and trust in institutions are conditions for the proper functioning of democracy. In short, institutions are the basis, feed and give value to democracy through various mechanisms at different times. March and Olsen (2006) point out that there are various theoretical approaches to institutions that are distinguished mainly by: first, how they conceive the nature of institutions; second, how they explain the processes that translate into structures and rules and their political impacts, and, lastly, the processes that turn human behavior into rules and structures to maintain, transform or eliminate institutions
