Answer:
Increase
Explanation:
The elimination of minimum wage, means that the wage or "price" for teenage workers will decrease.
Next we can use the information that both type of workers are complements. Remembering that two goods are complements if the cross price elasticity is negative. This means that if the price of one good decreases the demand for the other will increase.
Since the price for teenage workers decreased by the elimination of minimum wage that will make the demand for adult workers to increase.
Answer: B) a trainee's performance declines after training
Explanation: Negative transfer occurs when previous learning hinders further learning. It is best defined as the interference of previous knowledge with new ones, wherein the new set of knowledge could hurt the performance of a new often related knowledge. A typical example could be changing from a right-handed to a left-handed wheel drive or from a manual to an automatic transmission. Negative transfer usually is problematic during the early stages of learning a new task but with experience, learners can correct the effects of negative transfer.
Answer: total revenues from intercompany sales.
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that during the year a parent makes sales of inventory at a profit to its 75 percent owned subsidiary and that the subsidiary also makes sales of inventory at a profit to its parent during the same year.
We are further told that both the parent and the subsidiary have on hand at the end of the year 20 percent of the inventory acquired from one another.
In this case, the consolidated revenues for the year should exclude total revenues from intercompany sales
Answer:
Floating cost adjustment is 3.25%
Explanation:
Flotation-adjusted cost of equity = (Expected dividend at the end of Year 1 / Net proceeds per share) + Growth rate.
Expected dividend at the end of Year 1 (D1) = $ 2.30 (given in question)
Net proceeds per share = (21.30 - 4 % of 21.30) = $ 20.448
Flotation-adjusted cost of equity = (2.30 / 20.448) + 0.04
= 0.1125 + 0.04
= 0.1525 i.e., 15.25 %.
Flotation cost adjustment = Flotation-adjusted cost of equity - Cost of equity without flotation adjustment.
= 15.25 % - 12 % (given in question)
= 3.25 %.
Conclusion:- Flotation cost adjustment = 3.25 %
Answer:
When comparing the real estate market of any region or state, there are factors for consideration:
a) Population size
b) Employment status
c) Real estate market
d) Renting strength
e) Price
f) Quality in terms of home structure and a serene environment.
Explanation:
In the question, there are two American cities up for comparison: The city of Pittsburgh and the Philadelphia city, both in the Pennsylvania region. Both cities have comfortable environments which are habitable but here, we have to choose or rather compare both. The first factor is the population size. The two cities which are in the same region, have a considerable population size but when compared, Philadelphia has the upper hand. In real estate business, population is key as a region which a better and fuller population is appreciated more. The second factor is the employment status of the inhabitants. The employment status of these two cities are commendable but Pittsburgh is quite flabbergasting. The employment rate of Pittsburgh to Philadelphia is up to 57%. Employment status is a key determinant when real estate market is mentioned because employed persons are the ones who can actually pay when due. The third factor is the real estate market. This is another factor which is very important in determining the cities' real estate market. Over the years, Philadelphia has shown positive signs of a healthy real estate market which nicks that of Pittsburgh. Other factors listed above have clearly been favourable to Philadelphia because of their location but in terms of price, Pittsburgh appears cheaper with an average price of $1258 compared to Philadelphia's $1,652.
