
This is a equation of a ellipse (0,0) centered
Domais: {x∈R/-3≤x≤3}
Range:{y∈R/-2≤y≤2}
Answer:
4 units i think
Step-by-step explanation:
i dont know how beacuse 4 is answer
Answer:
so principal amount is $7862.07
Step-by-step explanation:
Given data
rate = 7*1/4 % = 29/4 %
interest = $190
time = 4 months = 4/12 year
to find out
principal
solution
we know the simple interest formula i.e.
interest = ( principal × rate × time ) /100 ..................1
now put all value rate time and interest in equation 1 we get interest here
interest = ( principal × rate × time ) /100
190 = ( principal × 29/4 × 4/12 ) /100
principal = 190 × 12 ×100 / 29
principal = 7862.068966
so principal amount is $7862.07
9514 1404 393
Answer:
(a) 1. Distributive property 2. Combine like terms 3. Addition property of equality 4. Division property of equality
Step-by-step explanation:
Replacement of -1/2(8x +2) by -4x -1 is use of the <em>distributive property</em>, eliminating choices B and D.
In step 3, addition of 1 to both sides of the equation is use of the <em>addition property of equality</em>, eliminating choice C. This leaves only choice A.
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
This problem makes a distinction between the addition property of equality and the subtraction property of equality. They are essentially the same property, since addition of +1 is the same as subtraction of -1. The result shown in Step 3 could be from addition of +1 to both sides of the equation, or it could be from subtraction of -1 from both sides of the equation.
In general, you want to add the opposite of the number you don't want. Here, that number is -1, so we add +1. Of course, adding an opposite is the same as subtracting.
In short, you can argue both choices A and C have correct justifications. The only reason to prefer choice A is that we usually think of adding positive numbers as <em>addition</em>, and adding negative numbers as <em>subtraction</em>.
The Income Statement for Nascar Motors in April and May 2017 under Throughput Costing is given as attached.
<h3>What is a throughput costing?</h3>
This refers a costing technique, also known as super-variable costing, which solely takes direct materials into account when calculating product costs.
The other expenses are all classed as period costs and are all deducted from income in the time period in which they are spent.
<h3>What is the Contrast between the results in requirement 1 with those in requirement 1 of Exercise 9-21?</h3>
It is to be noted that Throughput costing has the lowest operating income in April while having the greatest operating income in May.
More so than either absorption or variable costing, throughput costing emphasizes sales as the source of operational income. See the attached.
<h3>What is one motivation for Nascar Motors to adopt throughput costing?</h3>
It is to be noted that production that doesn't result in a commensurate sale in the same time period is penalized under throughput costing.
When compared to variable costing, costs that are variable with regard to production but are not direct materials are expensed in the period of incurrence.
In contrast to variable costing or absorption costing, throughput costing offers less of motivation to create inventory.
Learn more about throughput costing at:
brainly.com/question/15579189
#SPJ1