Baker, Schultz, and Halstead argue that the united states could exploit significant strategic and economic gains if it invests in cleaner energy technologies and supports international efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
The statement is false.
According to early projections from the US Energy Information Administration, cleaner renewable energy accounted for around 12.6% of total primary energy consumption and about 19.8% of domestically produced power in the US in 2020.
The policy, which was based on an economic model created by Resources for the Future, would cut carbon emissions by 50% by 2035.
The Council, which was established in 2017 by Ted Halstead, former Republican Secretaries of State James Baker and George Shultz, has put together a coalition of businesses, environmental organisations, economists, and other individuals to advocate their climate plan.
The complete question is:
Baker, schultz, and halstead argue that the united states could exploit significant strategic and economic gains if it invests in cleaner energy technologies and supports international efforts to reduce carbon emissions. True or false?
To Learn more about Cleaner energy, here
brainly.com/question/23903612
#SPJ4
the answer is aggregate. hope this this helps, have a great day!
An example of Algebra structure work is simplify (8-3)+3.
<h3>What is algebraic structure?</h3>
In mathematics, an algebraic structure is known to be a term that is made up of a nonempty set A, a combination of operations on A of finite series and a finite group of identities.
To simply this equation, (8-3)+3.
One has to follow the order of operations using the P.E.M/D.A/S technique, the expression that are in the parenthesis have to be solved first.
2 of 3
(5)+3 = 8
Therefore, the answer is 8
Learn more about Algebra structure from
brainly.com/question/22399890
Answer: less than the number exhibiting a variant near the middle value.
Answer:
a. 99.30% of the woman meet the height requirement
b. If all women are eligible except the shortest 1% and the tallest 2%, then height should be between 58.32 and 68.83
Explanation:
<em>According to the survey</em>, women's heights are normally distributed with mean 63.9 and standard deviation 2.4
a)
A branch of the military requires women's heights to be between 58 in and 80 in. We need to find the probabilities that heights fall between 58 in and 80 in in this distribution. We need to find z-scores of the values 58 in and 80 in. Z-score shows how many standard deviations far are the values from the mean. Therefore they subtracted from the mean and divided by the standard deviation:
z-score of 58 in= 
= -2.458
z-score of 80 in= 
= 6.708
In normal distribution 99.3% of the values have higher z-score than -2.458
0% of the values have higher z-score than 6.708. Therefore 99.3% of the woman meet the height requirement.
b)
To find the height requirement so that all women are eligible except the shortest 1% and the tallest 2%, we need to find the boundary z-score of the
shortest 1% and the tallest 2%. Thus, upper bound for z-score has to be 2.054 and lower bound is -2.326
Corresponding heights (H) can be found using the formula
and
Thus lower bound for height is 58.32 and
Upper bound for height is 68.83
