1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tems11 [23]
2 years ago
7

based on the sources and your knowledge of u.s. history analyze the changing role of the federal government during the twentieth

century and it's political and economic effects on the country
History
1 answer:
NeX [460]2 years ago
4 0

During the twentieth century, the federal government of the US country becomes stronger, more powerful, and richer in comparison to the previous years.

<h3>What is the federal government?</h3>

The government in the country of the US is called the federal government. It includes the various states and provinces of the US country which have the power to make relevant laws and take reliable decisions.

The US country became the leading country in the year 1917 in the political world. After world war II, the US country becomes more powerful in the whole world. They become a member of the trading organizations and military organizations of the world. They also had a lead role in political scenarios of the world.

Therefore, the federal government of the US country has developed a lot in the 20th Century.

Learn more about the US in the 20th Century in the given link;

brainly.com/question/15387599

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Explain how Caesar was a genius at military strategy
sashaice [31]

Being a good strategist is not necessarily about winning battles, but making the right/favourable preparations and choosing the right conditions for a battle. There are three realms where warfare are concerned: strategy, tactics, and logistics. All are important, but the latter is almost always neglected by amateurs such as Adolf Hitler.  

Caius Julius Caesar is particularly well-known for his campaigns in Galia Transalpina (France). He was fortunate enough to keep the gaulic tribes at odds with each other during most of his stay, but responded competently when they united under Vercingetorix. Caesar also fought the loyalists for control of the Roman Empire, and defeated Pompeius Magnus at Pharsalus.  

Caesar had the benefit of mostly fighting disorganised and easily startled Gauls during most of his career, not to mention incompetent enemy commanders. Yet his genius was probably more in being able to combine good generalship with very shrewd politicking. He was extremely indebted during most of his career and hounded by Senators that wanted his head because they saw him as a demagogue. Caesar's only choices were to surrender and be forced into some ignominious and inglorious life or to press onward to become the new king of Rome.  

He crossed the the River Rubicon with only 5,000 men and forced the Senate to flee the eternal city. He left Mark Antony in his stead to manage affairs in Rome while he campaigned (he had a sound judgment of people) in Greece. It should be noted that Caesar was uncommonly lucky (until the end) and ever so daring. Even though he did not always start the battle with the enemy, he usually forced his enemies to fight him on his own terms. He was very active as a commander and very good at promoting loyalty among the ranks (both thanks to praise and loot). He always took contingency precautions such as when he called for the aid of Mithradates of Pergamum when Caesar was besieged by the Egyptians in Alexandria.  

However, take note that there were other very good Roman generals such as Pompeius Magnus, Mark Antony, Caius Marius, Lucius Sulla and Scipio Africanus. All of these are known to history and some even fought more distinguished battles than Caesar, but unfortunately they are neither as significant nor as popular as Caesar.


**sorry it was so long, sum it up if ya need to/**


6 0
3 years ago
Who is the founder of this app?​
lbvjy [14]

Answer:

  • Michal Borkowski

Brainly was found in 2009 in Poland.

<u>OAmalOHopeO</u>

7 0
3 years ago
If papyrus couldn’t last a long time it Egypt’s dry environment, how would that have affected our understanding of ancient Egypt
Reil [10]

Explanation:

much of the knowledge written on them may have disappeared

7 0
2 years ago
In 2011, the General Assembly targeted undocumented immigration by passing a law that
nadezda [96]
Punishes their employers

Up to 3,000 dollars per person or 6 months in jail
8 0
3 years ago
What questions should a historian ask to determine whether a source is credible? Select three options. Is it relevant to the sub
mina [271]

Answer:

A) Is it relevant to the subject or event?

C) Does it contain information that is outdated?

E) Does it explain a version of how the event occurred?

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The 1920s are often called the roaring twenties because the decade was noted for
    13·1 answer
  • Which correctly describes the religious atmosphere of medical japan
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME ASAP!!!!!
    14·2 answers
  • Prince Henry learned of African gold while he served as:
    15·2 answers
  • What system carries the blood through the body​
    11·2 answers
  • In the 2000 Bush v. Gore decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
    10·1 answer
  • If slavery almost died out in the Middle Ages, what brought it back?
    8·1 answer
  • European explorers were sent to the New World for?​
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement best illustrates a debatable argumentative thesis?
    6·2 answers
  • When someone is considering a career as a lawyer, future earnings minus the cost of law school is the net cost. net benefit. fut
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!