In two species of birds, both of which form monogamous pair(one male and one female), In species 1, you find that the eggs in a pair's nest are in fact almost always the offspring of that pair. In species 2, you are surprised to find that many of the eggs in a nest were actually fathered by males of neighboring pairs. Apparently, mating outside of monogamous pairings is widespread in species 2. we would expect that female of species 2 would have sperm from multiple males in their reproductive tracts.
- This is because the species 2 are having many eggs.
- These eggs were formed due to fertilization with multiple male bird partners.
- As a result we can expect eggs with different genotypes.
Thus from the above points we can conclude that two species of birds, both of which form monogamous pairs, female of species 2 would have sperm from multiple males in their reproductive tracts
Learn more about the fertilization in birds:
brainly.com/question/234670
#SPJ4
Answser
it migth be B i am not sure
C. Wind turbines are more reliable then solar cells.
Answer:
The correct answer would be A) ribosomes.
A ribosome is a vesicular structure present in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. They consist of ribosomal RNA and associated proteins.
They are the site of translation in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells.
They are made up two units which are called large sub-unit and small sub-unit.
In prokaryotic cells, 70S ribosomes are present which are made up of 50S large sub-units and 30S small sub-units.
In eukaryotic cells, 80S ribosomes are present which are made up of 60S large sub-units and 40S small sun-units.
Explanation:
Scientific laws and scientific theories are very similar.
They both discuss and observe phenomena that have already occurred and been evaluated.
The main difference between the two is that law defines nature and what it does conditionally, and the reaction of nature when these conditions encounter.
To sum it up, law discusses the behavior of something that transpires in many annotations.
A theory on the other hand discusses not the behavior, but the functions. The “why” factor so to speak.
