Answer:
SCC won't pay any tax
Explanation:
Their loss of $30,000 in year 1 will be unused and made available to counterbalance the total generated earnings in year 2.
The $20,000 earnings in year 2 can be used to counterbalance the whole taxable income; so, SCC will not pay pay tax. SCC will have a ($10,000) loss carryover available for year 3 and beyond
Based on the fact that ActioNOW and Becca entered into an oral contract where Becca agrees to work on a project for ActioNOW for eighteen months, the enforcers of this contract are d. none of the choices.
<h3>Who can enforce this contract?</h3>
This transaction between Becca and ActioNOW was an oral contract which means that it falls under the Statute of Frauds. However, for an oral contract to be enforceable under this Statute, the goods or services exchanged have to be less then $500 in value.
The services or goods also have to be less than 1 year in duration. Because Becca and ActioNow agreed for a contract of 18 months which is more than a year, this contract is not enforceable under the Statute of Frauds and so the government cannot enforce this contract.
Options include:
- a. ActioNOW.
- b. Becca.
- c. any third party, such as ActioNOW’s clients.
- d. none of the choices
Find out more on the Statute of Frauds at brainly.com/question/14854791
#SPJ1
Answer:
keep producing in the short run but exit the industry or go out of business in the long run
Explanation:
A perfect competition is characterised by many buyers and sellers of homogeneous goods and services. Market prices are set by the forces of demand and supply. There are no barriers to entry or exit of firms into the industry.
In the long run, firms earn zero economic profit. If in the short run firms are earning economic profit, in the long run firms would enter into the industry. This would drive economic profit to zero.
Also, if in the short run, firms are earning economic loss, in the long run, firms would exit the industry until economic profit falls to zero.
A firm should shut down in the short run if price is less than average variable cost. But since the diner's price is greater than average variable cost, it should continue production.
A firm should exit the industry in the long run if price is less than average total cost. the diner's price is less than average total cost, so it should shut down in the long run
Answer:
Option 3: $12 down with equal payments of $5 for 12 months
Explanation:
In option 1 :
The cost is $ 88,
In option 2 :
Down payment = $ 5,
Weekly payment = $ 8,
Number of weeks = 10,
So, the total cost = 5 + 8 × 10 = 5 + 80 = $ 85,
In option 3 :
Down payment = $ 12,
Monthly payment = $ 5,
Number of months = 12,
So, the total cost = 12 + 5 × 12 = 12 + 60 = $ 72,
In option 4 :
Down payment = $ 20,
Monthly payment = $ 20,
Number of months = 12,
So, the total cost = 12 + 20 × 12 = 12 + 240= $ 252
∵ 72 < 85 < 88 < 252
Hence, option 3 is better.
Answer:
Management Level
Explanation:
A cost allocation method is not an activity based costing typically.
Interviews with management that have adequate knowledge and the cost classification are usually done at management level
