1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
charle [14.2K]
2 years ago
9

A Supreme Court justice who agrees with the majority in a case, but disagrees in whole

Law
1 answer:
igomit [66]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

concurring

Explanation:

a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different or additional reasons as the basis for their decision.

You might be interested in
What principles of government are included in the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, United States Constitu
seraphim [82]

Answer:

Governing power should be divided between different levels of government.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
In the healthcare field, there are face-to-face types of jobs and behind-the-scenes jobs. What is the difference between the two
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

The difference between the face-to-face types of jobs and behind-the-scenes jobs in the health care field are:

1. Face-to-face types of jobs are mostly clinical jobs, whereas, behind-the-scenes jobs are mostly non-clinical jobs

2. Face-to-face jobs usually involve diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing care, whereas behind-the-scenes jobs usually involve medical billers and coders, transcriptionists, hospital executives, receptionists, etc.

3. Face-to-face job titles are usually termed as Physician, Hospitalist, Registered Nurse, etc while the behind-the-scenes jobs titles are usually termed as a medical transcriptionist, pharmaceutical representative, biomedical engineer, medical recruiter, and medical device sales.

7 0
2 years ago
What evidence could be given to show that the executive branch is more powerful today than originally intended in the constituti
Artist 52 [7]
When the writers of the Constitution were initially deciding what powers and responsibilities the executive branch—headed by the president—would have, they were heavily influenced by their experience with the British government under King George III. Having seen how the king and other European monarchs tended to abuse their powers, the designers of the Constitution wanted to place strict limits on the power that the president would have. At the same time, they wanted to give the president enough power to conduct foreign policy and to run the federal government efficiently without being hampered by the squabbling of legislators from individual states. In other words, the Framers wanted to design an executive office that would provide effective and coherent leadership but that could never become a tyranny.

Read more: Executive Branch - The Executive Branch And The Constitution - President, Power, Powers, and Framers - JRank Articles https://law.jrank.org/pages/6652/Executive-Branch-Executive-Branch-Constitution.html#ixzz6rIgGN7y3
3 0
3 years ago
What do you think about Turks ?
lesya692 [45]
My general opinion was that they were very strict and they were living behind time.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The critical concept that emerged in the palko decision is that of ________ rights.
Lelu [443]

Answer:

Double Jeopardy right

Explanation:

This clause has it that is prohibited for a person to be convicted for the same crime more than once. This is a fifth amendment clause that was developed following the palko v Connecticut case. Palko had being charged for first degree murder but he got second degree sentence. The state of Connecticut filed an appeal against him and won the appeal. He was therefore sentenced to death

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Walter plays an important role in the correctional system of the United States. He works at a prison, where his primary duty is
    8·1 answer
  • According to John F. Galliher, legal definitions of criminality are arrived at through a __________ process.
    9·1 answer
  • The defendant will not be found liable for defamation, regardless of intent or knowledge of the falsity of the claim, if which p
    13·1 answer
  • how can the growing use of personal health records be used to improve the delivery of health care patient​
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is TRUE about judicial review?
    6·2 answers
  • When can omission satisfy the actual of accomplice liability
    14·1 answer
  • In a criminal case who has the burden of proof.
    13·2 answers
  • You must be prepared to stop within ___ feet of an intersection?<br> 50<br> 100<br> 150<br> 200
    14·2 answers
  • There are many modes of constitutional interpretation. In 500 words discuss two forms (i.e., aspirationalism, strict constructio
    13·2 answers
  • Pháp luật thực chất là kết quả tất yếu bởi Nhà nước, là cái bóng của Nhà nước
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!