Answer:
I think it might be A but not sure
Explanation:
The correct answer is: following the law of the land. Please mark Brainliest if helpful, thx!
Answer:
Greene (U.S. 1999): Held that a Brady violation occurs when: (1) evidence is favorable to exculpation or impeachment; (2) the evidence is either willfully or inadvertently withheld by the prosecution; and (3) the withholding of the evidence is prejudicial to the defendant.
Explanation:
Greene (U.S. 1999): Held that a Brady violation occurs when: (1) evidence is favorable to exculpation or impeachment; (2) the evidence is either willfully or inadvertently withheld by the prosecution; and (3) the withholding of the evidence is prejudicial to the defendant.
Answer: It is a proper question
Explanation:
The witness is making a claim about what had transpired between the defendant and the plaintiff and in order for their testimony to stand, they need to have integrity such that a reasonable person can believe their testimony in this case.
In asking about the false claim that the witness had once filed, the defendant is trying to establish that the witness has no integrity and so in proving their untruthfulness, the defendant hopes to convince the court that the witness does not have enough integrity to be a witness.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is TRUE that the shift from periodic social drinking to substance abuse evolves to meet a person's need for "comfort and esteem."
According to various research findings, the people that move from periodic social drinking to substance abuse usually do such due to the need to give themselves comfort when they are suffering from one sad moment or depression.
The other way people change from periodic drinking to substance abuse is to elevate their self-esteem, especially when they are low on confidence.
Hence, in this case, the statement is TRUE.
