1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-BARSIC- [3]
3 years ago
11

Agnozzi, who is deaf, purchased several items at a large chain discount store. One of the items was a large inflated doll for hi

s daughter. Agnozzi went to a cash register near a store entrance to pay for his goods. The doll was so large that the sales clerk could not find a bag to hold it. With the doll under his arm and his other purchases in bags held in both hands, Agnozzi left the store. As he did so, a store employee stationed at the door to welcome people in and conduct security screens of those leaving, noticed the unbagged doll. The employee was instructed to stop and check the receipt of any party leaving the store with an unbagged item. As a consequence, she asked Agnozzi to stop. When he did not, she shouted at him to stop. Finally, she yelled, “Stop thief,” and gave chase. Other store personnel joined in and threw Agnozzi down onto the asphalt in the parking lot. Agnozzi finally was able to make the store personnel understand he was deaf and that he had the receipt in his pocket. Upon seeing the receipt they let him go with apologies. Although he was embarrassed, his clothes torn, and his skin scraped, Agnozzi accepted the apologies and left. Now he is reconsidering. Would it be ethical for Agnozzi to bring suit against the discount store? Does Agnozzi owe a duty to bring suit? If so, to whom and for what?
Law
1 answer:
Alexxandr [17]3 years ago
4 0

The question of whether it would be ethical for Agnozzi's experience at the store warrants a law suit is:

  • Based on the fact that Agnozzi did not have any clear indication that he was deaf, the store employee was well within his rights to give chase because he did not heed to the warnings.

<h3>Ethics in a law suit</h3>

This refers to the moral grounds which a person has to challenge an experience or a situation which he or someone else was involved in that he believed was unfair and wants to contest it in a law court.

With this in mind, Agnozzi can file a law suit but he would unlikely get a favorable ruling from a judge based on the situation of things as they occurred.

Read more about ethical law suits here:

brainly.com/question/19569605

You might be interested in
The Florida Financial Responsibility Law
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

$10,000

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Under what conditions may "reasonable
Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:sorry i need points

Explanation: although i think the answer is to over come suspect resistance

6 0
3 years ago
Look at the far left lane in the picture explain what the red car is doing and what it needs to do to travel safely?
Wittaler [7]

Answer:

The red car appears to be "tailgating" the red SUV ... following too close behind it.

The driver of the red car should immediately back off ... leave some more space between his car and the SUV.

If the SUV isn't driving fast enough for him, he should fall in behind the blue car (at a safe distance), and perhaps into one of the two right-hand lanes, and WAIT for a safe opportunity to pass all the traffic and move out ahead.  The traffic pattern is sure to change in a minute or two.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Each of the following is a category of tort law except: Select one: a. Invasion of privacy. b. Strict Liability Tort. c. Neglige
Nata [24]

Answer:

a. Invasion of privacy.

Explanation:

Tort law decides if an individual ought to be considered legitimately responsible for a physical issue against another, just as what sort of remuneration the harmed party is qualified for.

There are three main categories: intentional torts, negligence, and strict liability.

5 0
3 years ago
Read this statement.
elixir [45]

Answer: Rule; Issue; Analysis

Explanation:

Legal reasoning refers to a method of thought whereby legal rules are applied to specific interactions.

When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a (rule) can be made as to whether or not the (issue) applies to the (analysis).

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Three roles and responsibilities the prime minister of Canada has ?anyone ??? Is for right now
    7·1 answer
  • 5) What is the punishment for Kidnapping?
    14·2 answers
  • If party is unhappy with the decision handed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, what is their next step?
    12·1 answer
  • Why might the government not want to give lawyers to every single person accused of any
    10·1 answer
  • Promulgation means the approval of the president of the republic to issue the law, and it become totally obligatory. True or fal
    7·1 answer
  • specifies which people in a sport organization are required to report suspected child abuse to law enforcement.
    13·1 answer
  • The members of Climate Action believe that a recently enacted federal law is unconstitutional. They write and sign a petition to
    7·1 answer
  • If a(n) _____ is set for the defendant, he or she is entitled to stay at his or her home until the trial date.
    6·1 answer
  • _______________ is a rule in tort law, used in the majority of states, that reduces the plaintiff's recovery in proportion to th
    14·1 answer
  • How does the Declaration of Sentiments use ethos?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!