1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
-BARSIC- [3]
2 years ago
11

Agnozzi, who is deaf, purchased several items at a large chain discount store. One of the items was a large inflated doll for hi

s daughter. Agnozzi went to a cash register near a store entrance to pay for his goods. The doll was so large that the sales clerk could not find a bag to hold it. With the doll under his arm and his other purchases in bags held in both hands, Agnozzi left the store. As he did so, a store employee stationed at the door to welcome people in and conduct security screens of those leaving, noticed the unbagged doll. The employee was instructed to stop and check the receipt of any party leaving the store with an unbagged item. As a consequence, she asked Agnozzi to stop. When he did not, she shouted at him to stop. Finally, she yelled, “Stop thief,” and gave chase. Other store personnel joined in and threw Agnozzi down onto the asphalt in the parking lot. Agnozzi finally was able to make the store personnel understand he was deaf and that he had the receipt in his pocket. Upon seeing the receipt they let him go with apologies. Although he was embarrassed, his clothes torn, and his skin scraped, Agnozzi accepted the apologies and left. Now he is reconsidering. Would it be ethical for Agnozzi to bring suit against the discount store? Does Agnozzi owe a duty to bring suit? If so, to whom and for what?
Law
1 answer:
Alexxandr [17]2 years ago
4 0

The question of whether it would be ethical for Agnozzi's experience at the store warrants a law suit is:

  • Based on the fact that Agnozzi did not have any clear indication that he was deaf, the store employee was well within his rights to give chase because he did not heed to the warnings.

<h3>Ethics in a law suit</h3>

This refers to the moral grounds which a person has to challenge an experience or a situation which he or someone else was involved in that he believed was unfair and wants to contest it in a law court.

With this in mind, Agnozzi can file a law suit but he would unlikely get a favorable ruling from a judge based on the situation of things as they occurred.

Read more about ethical law suits here:

brainly.com/question/19569605

You might be interested in
3. While seem by some as a way to get rich, the
Marizza181 [45]
I would check all of them they all do
6 0
2 years ago
Can someone tell me how to answer these questions!
Nuetrik [128]

Answer:

Explanation:

The truth of the legal would influence my decision. I would need more info to give you a complete answer in my opinion

3 0
3 years ago
Do you think attorneys should be able to dismiss jurors without stating a specific reason? Why or why not?
-Dominant- [34]

Answer:

No.

Explanation:

Every one deserves an explanation. You can't give a answer without backup. It wouldn't be fair to the other and it can cause a whole controversy.

8 0
3 years ago
What was the goal of the National Origins Act of 1924 Brainly?
Hoochie [10]

The National Origins Act of 1924 aimed to regulate both the amount and quality of immigrants to the United States in an effort to stop further eroding of the ethnic composition of American society.

The 1924 Immigration Act, which was a legislative expression of the xenophobia that swept through America throughout the 1920s, especially with regard to immigrants from eastern and southern Europe, was passed by the House on this day in 1924. The first total numerical immigration quota, which applied to almost 350,000 persons in 1921, was eventually reduced to 165,000 in 1924. The 1924 statute established annual limits for each country based on the number of foreign-born Americans from each European country who resided in the United States in 1890. While severely restricting immigration from southern and eastern Europe and outright banning it from nearly all of Asia, Congress devised an extraordinarily tight system of ethnic quotas in 1924, which effectively ended mass immigration for decades.

Learn more about Act of 1924 from

brainly.com/question/1916562

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Philip Laws leased an apartment from Candice Sutton. Laws had notified Sutton on more than one occasion that the wooden steps to
Dimas [21]

Answer: both of them will have the fault.

Explanation:well, if I were to be the Judge of this case, I will hold both to be at fault. On Sutton's part, she leased the house out and she should have kept it in a good shape. Though the house was not in good shape, Laws had lodge series of complaints concerning the disrepair, which means that Sutton should have had it repaired.

Sutton promised Laws that he was going to repair the stairs, so, I would say, Laws would have assumed that Sutton would have repaired the stairs before he(laws) returned back from his business trip.

However, we should not forget that whenever we assess a situation according to the law there must have been a legal contract but in this case, Laws never entered into a contract with Sutton to make the repairs. Which means that Laws cannot fully blame Sutton. Therefore, i will hold both responsible.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The legislative system is given powers granted to it by the Constitution in_________.
    10·2 answers
  • Who determines whether an individual can act as an expert witness?
    8·1 answer
  • Name the system of government
    15·1 answer
  • The Framers of the US Constitution created two separate houses of Congress, each of which they expected would serve different co
    14·1 answer
  • What resources are needed to set up or establish perimeter?
    5·1 answer
  • Though the two political parties often differ on their beliefs, sometimes they are able to come together in support known as____
    11·1 answer
  • How do corporations engage EPA when they are putting laws into regulations
    5·1 answer
  • Identify the exceptions to a search warrant when conducting a search for evidence
    10·1 answer
  • Interest groups (4 points)
    5·2 answers
  • What is an example of a tier 2 police encounter?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!