Answer:
royalties
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that in the context of business these obligations are referred to as royalties. Royalties are shared obligations in which the franchisee agrees to pay the franchisor part of the profits that they make from using their brand name or products. Such as is being illustrated in this scenario.
Answer:
The answer is "Risk aversion" ,"Facilitate"
Explanation:
In financial aspects and business, Risk aversion is the conduct of people (particularly customers and speculators), who, when presented to vulnerability, endeavor to bring down that vulnerability. It is the faltering of an individual to consent to a circumstance with an obscure result as opposed to another circumstance with a more unsurprising result yet conceivably lower anticipated result.
For instance, a Risk avert specialist may decide to invest their cash into a ledger with a low yet ensured loan fee, as opposed to into a stock that may have high anticipated returns, yet in addition includes an opportunity of losing esteem.
Answer:
Journal Entry are given below
Explanation:
solution
Journal Entry are as
PERPETUAL INVENTORY SYSTEM
debit credit
(1) March 2, Merchandise inventory $800,000
Borst Company $800,000
( record Inventory purchase )
(2) March 6,
Borst Company $140,000
Merchandise inventory $140,000
( record goods return )
(3) March 12,
Borst Company (800000-140000) $660,000
Cash (800000-140000) ×98% $646,800
Merchandise inventory $13,200
(800000-140000)× 2%
( record goods return )
Megan could accuse Techtronic of engaging in <u>d. defamation</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Defamation means causing damage to the good reputation of someone. Making of false or offensive statement about an individual’s behavior or character leaves a bad impression about the individual.
Defamation may be oral or published.
In the above scenario, there was no evidence against Megan regarding racial discrimination. Robin shared the details about Megan with the caller without knowing the situation correctly. This caused defamation of Megan which may lead him to refrain from hiring in the new company.
Answer:
Business umbrella approach gives inclusion to the firm against those misfortunes that may bankrupt the firm. The arrangement covers a definitive misfortune in abundance of held breaking point happens because of real injury, property harm, promoting and individual injury. A definitive misfortune is the lawful risk to which back up plan is committed to pay. As far as possible is the accessible furthest reaches of the fundamental protection. According to the umbrella arrangement, the protected needs to keep up some base measure of obligation before the case is paid by the umbrella strategy. In the event that the guaranteed is secured under some other strategy, at that point first that sum is paid and remaining sum is paid by umbrella approach in the wake of fulfilling oneself safeguarded maintenance.
The complete loss to the organization is $5 million, at that point $1 million will be paid by general obligation strategy and $1 million will be paid by business auto approach. Out of the remaining $3 million, self-safeguarded limit is $100,000 which demonstrates that $2.9 million ($3 million less 5100,000) will be paid by umbrella arrangement.
