Answer:
For both 10,000 units and 20,000 units, the best alternative is Vendor B
Explanation:
Using the information provided in the question, we can write the following:
Annual Volume of 10,000 units
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 170,000 (we multiply the variable cost per unit by total units)
Fixed costs = 20,000
Total costs = 370,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 140,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 380,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 200,000 (we simply multiply the price by the quantity)
Vendor B
Total cost = 180,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 190,000
The cheapest option is Vendor B
Now for the 20,000 units:
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 340,000
Fixed costs = 200,000
Total costs = 540,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 280,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 520,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 400,000
Vendor B
Total cost = 360,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 380,000
Therefore, Vendor B is once again, the cheapest alternative.
The price elasticity of a good will tend to be larger if the fewer number of substitute goods will be available.
The cross elasticity of demand for substitute goods is always positive because the demand of one good increases at the time when the price for the substitute good increases however the cross elasticity of demand for complementary goods is always negative.
For example, if the price of coffee rises, the quantity demanded for tea which is the best substitute of coffee beverage will increase as consumers will switch to a less expensive but the substitutable alternative.
This is reflected in the cross elasticity of the demand formula, as both the numerator which is the percentage change in the demand of tea and denominator which is the price of coffee shows a positive increase.
To know more about price elasticity of demand here:
brainly.com/question/13565779
#SPJ4
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Open market operations is a monetary policy instrument that is used by the Federal reserve for controlling the money supply in an economy. If there is a need to decrease the money supply in an economy then fed sells the government securities to the public and on the other hand if there is a need to increase the money supply in an economy then fed purchases the government securities from the public.
So, here the expansionary policy is to purchases the treasury bills from the public.
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
Answer:
A) variable costing
Explanation:
acording to a citated text the variable costing excluded all fixed manufacturing costs is the Variable costing
