Answer:
Nathanial "Nat" Turner
Explanation:
Nathanial "Nat" Turner, a black American slave who was born on the 2nd of October, 1800 and died on the 11th of November, 1831. In August 1831, he led a solely effective slave rebellion in America.
Nat's rebellion encouraged the widespread persecution of slaves and freed blacks, and eventually resulted in the death of nearly two-hundred blacks by the hands of erratic white mobs.
He was eventually convicted and executed by hanging.
The 1959 Tibetan<span> Uprising or 1959 </span>Tibetan<span> Rebellion began on 10 March 1959, when a revolt .... On 9 March, the head of the </span>Dalai Lama's<span> bodyguard was visited by Chinese ... directed at </span>Tibetan<span> officials perceived not to </span>have<span> protected the </span>Dalai Lama<span> or to ... They </span>did<span> not claim that the Norbulingka had not been damaged.</span>March 17, 1959: The Dalai Lama<span> flees </span>Tibet<span> for asylum in India. ... The State Oracle, the</span>Dalai Lama's<span> advisor, urged him to </span>flee<span>. ... “So profound is the despair among some </span>Tibetans<span> that more than 130 people </span>have<span> committed
</span>
Answer: D
Explanation: Henry Vll wanted England to be a Protestant nation for personal reasons, while Elizabeth, his daughter, wanted to bring Protestantism back to bring peace to the realm.
The entire situation with the colonies revolting from British control wouldn't have happened without the Seven Years War (of which the section happening in the North American colonies is called the "French and Indian War").
The British only raised taxes, which is the thing that first upset the American Colonies, to pay down the debt from fighting that war.
The British wouldn't have been considering allowing the Catholic settlers from Canada to move into the Ohio Valley and to keep those from the American Colonies out if they hadn't won the war, since Canada would still have been French.
The American colonists would have had less grievances with the British for the way that the leadership of the British armies messed up in the Colonies if the war hadn't happened.
The American colonists wouldn't have had as many experienced combatants and leaders (Washington being a huge one that learned his skill in war fighting for the British) without the earlier war taking place.
