Answer:
oo answer A
Step-by-step explanation:
Oo answer A
Sna amaktukong po
Answer:
One Triangle = 2.09 in²
Two Triangles = 4.18 in²
Rectangle = 17.48 in²
Total area of whole trapezoid = 21.66 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
Since it was not clarified which region is shaded we will just find the area of each individual part of the shape.
Let's start with the triangles.
1. To find the area of a triangle, the formula is
. It is given that the base of one triangle is equal to 1.1 in and the height is equal to 3.8 in., so in the equation, it would look like:
in²
2. So now that we know one triangle is equal to 2.09 in², we now know that the other triangle is equal to the same area. To find the total of the two triangles you need to multiply the area by 2:
in²
Moving on to the rectangle...
1. To find the area of the rectangle we need to use the formula base times height or b x h. It is given that the height is 3.8 in while the length is 4.6 in. So in the equation it would look like:
in²
Now to find the total area of all shapes combined...
1. To do this, we just need to add up all the areas we found, so...
17.48 + 4.18 = 21.66 in²
Answer:
7
Step-by-step explanation:
10x-2=9x+5 because the angles are the same as m and n are parallel.
10x=9x+7
x=7
Answer:

The degrees of freedom are given by:
Now we can calculate the p value with the following probability:

And for this case since the p value is lower compared to the significance level
we can reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is different from 30.6 at the significance level of 0.05
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we have the following info given:
represent the sample mean
represent the sample deviation
represent the reference value to test.
represent the sample size selected
The statistic for this case is given by:

And replacing we got:

The degrees of freedom are given by:
Now we can calculate the p value with the following probability:

And for this case since the p value is lower compared to the significance level
we can reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true mean for this case is different from 30.6 at the significance level of 0.05