a friendly letter to your friend who just left the school so u telling her how much you missed her and what are the changes

English

1 answer:

sp2606 [1]1 year ago

5 0

Answer:

45A, PSV Gardens

T Nagar

Chennai – 600056

25.10.2020

Dear Christo,

I am so glad that I found time to write to you. I have been wanting to get in touch with you for some time now. How are you? Hope everyone at home is fine.

I was thinking about our time in school together, how we waited to meet each other, how we didn’t finish talking no matter how long we spoke, how we bunked classes together and how we used to do crazy things and escape without getting caught. I miss you and I miss being able to go to school everyday. School was fun when we were together. I bet not much has changed since we left school.

Did you know that our school is co-ed now? Gone are the days when we used to reign the corridors like we were the rulers of the whole campus. I heard from one of our juniors that they are planning an alumni meet next month. I hope both of us can make it and spend some time together like in old times.

Waiting to hear from you.

Love,

Dan

You might be interested in

Which example uses a third-person point of view?

ozzi

Answer:

<em>C. How on Earth, Jenny thought, could the concert have already started when she had left an hour early?</em>

Explanation:

This is the answer because, it says that "Jenny thought" and if it was using a 1st person point of view it would simply say "I thought". And it also says that when "she" had left an hour early. If it was a 1st person point of view it would also simply say "I". And it couldn't be option A, because it said "we" when the sentence (if it was trying to be in third person) should've used "they".

It can't have been option B, because it says, "in my experience" and if you were writing it in first person it would have been "in their experience", or "in (name)'s experience".

It also couldn't have been option D. Simply because it says, "As for me" and uses "I" instead of they, she, he, or even their name.

To make it short, option A, B, and D, do not have the correct wording to be a third-person sentence.

So, in conclusion, the only third-person sentence is option C.

And that's my answer.

7 0

2 years ago

The fear of foreigners during the 1920s was part of the return to:

Mashcka [7]

Konichiwa~! My name is Zalgo and I am here to help you out on this marvelous day. The answer to your question is C; Normalcy. It wouldn't be communism because that would be the hatred or murderous intent for the foreigners. It isn't Liberalism because that would be the curiosity of the foreigners. And it isn't democracy because then the foreigners would be political.

I hope that this helps! :3

"Stay Brainly and stay proud!" - Zalgo

(By the way, do you mind marking me a Brainliest? I'd greatly appreciate it! Arigato~! C:)

5 0

3 years ago

Read the passage from The Rámáyan of Válmiki.

algol13

The most likely reason the author uses the <em>word hapless</em> to describe the king is A. A. It has a negative connotation, which suggests that the king is weak.

This is shown based on the given description that the prince was ready to consecrate and the king was weak and powerless and thus she told him to redeem his gifts.

<h3>What is a Connotation?</h3>

This refers to the tone used to describe a thing and can either be positive or negative and this shows the way readers view a character or situation.

Therefore, we can see that the use of the word hapless has a negative connotation as it suggests that the king is weak.

And this is shown based on the given description that the prince was ready to consecrate and the king was weak and powerless and thus she told him to redeem his gifts.

This is seen as the Queen is described as young and she is also further described as one with eyes filled with envious hate, so she treats the king with disdain as the Prince was about to be consecrated.