If there were no human intervention in plant ecosystems, most probably we will have a thick and lush plant ecosytem. Soil can be richer compared to the soil that we have now.
However, if there are no human intervention, there will be an imbalance. There will be no consumers. It is important that there should be a balance in any type of eco system.
Agree because we need to look ahead into the future. We may have a normal life with not much negative effects but the future generations to come will. Plants will die causing animals to die with them. Good will become scarce and oxygen in the atmosphere will decrease.
So I don’t see answer choices here, but your answer is 50% of the offspring will be homozygous dominant with RR, and 100% of them will carry a homozygous dominant gene of Rr
If you take the two sets and put them into a punnett square, it would look like this (image attached):
When the two sets of alleles are crossed, you would end up with half of your pairs being fully dominant (RR), and the other half being dominant while containing a recessive gene (Rr). Since there’s only one recessive gene in these pairs, it gets overridden and the pair itself is dominant.
So your answer is 50% will be homozygous dominant with RR!
The answer for this is "All of above"
Answer:
Enzymes serve as catalysts to many biological processes, and so they are not used up in reactions and they may be recovered and reused. However, in a laboratory setting, reactions involving enzymes can leave the enzyme unrecoverable. This process makes the enzyme at once less reactive but more stable.