Answer:
The correct answer will be "Expatriate".
Explanation:
- An expatriate seems to be a migrant worker through his or her occupation, a specialist, or maybe even a skilled worker.
- Expatriate managers could've been characterized because of those who aren’t residents including its country during which individuals work, and were employed because of everyone's specialized operational skills but rather because of about there willingness to employ organization knowledge.
Answer:
I'm not 100 %sure but but I think 49 cents
Answer:
A) Dusty.
Explanation:
Generally, when you are dealing with property rights and any damages that occur to real property, the individual that possesses the oldest structure can sue other individuals that damage his/her structure by building or developing a new one.
E.g. in many cities, buildings or even homes tend to be built right next to other homes or buildings (specially in down town areas). If you are building a house right next to an existing house and the walls are damaged because because you dug to build a basement, then you are responsible and liable for the damages even if you never invaded the other property.
Answer:
The marginal propensity to save is 0.4
Explanation:
The marginal propensity to save is 1 - marginal propensity to consume.
The marginal propensity to consume is the proportion of an increase in income that the consumers will spend from this increased income and the marginal propensity to save is the proportion of the increase in income that will be saved.
The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) = Change in consumption / change in income
The MPC = (2100 - 1500) / (3000 - 2000) = 0.6
Thus, the marginal propensity to save is 1 - 0.6 = 0.4
Answer:
The answer id: D) Yes, because Stanford and DiggyWerx each receive a benefit and incur a detriment.
Explanation:
Both Stanford and DiggyWerx both receive a benefit from this contract; Stanford gets $5,500 and DiggyWerx gets accounting services for six months.
They both also incurred detriment since; Stanford promised to perform his accounting duties and DiggyWerx promised to pay him money.
Both parties incurred detriment (promised to do something) and something of value is exchanged benefiting both parties, so consideration exists and therefore the control is enforceable.
