The purpose of the IX Amendment was to claim the precept that the enumerated rights aren't exhaustive and very last and that the listing of certain rights does now no longer deny or disparage the life of different rights.
<h3>What do you know about Amendment IX?</h3>
No Title of Nobility will be granted with the aid of using the United States: And no Person preserving any Office of Profit or Trust below them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, take delivery of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any type whatever, from any King, Prince, or overseas State.
The rights included with the aid of using the Ninth Amendment aren't specified, they're mentioned as “unenumerated".
Therefore, The purpose of the IX Amendment was to claim the precept that the enumerated rights aren't exhaustive and very last and that the listing of certain rights does now no longer deny or disparage the life of different rights.
Learn more about IX Amendment here:
brainly.com/question/796033
#SPJ1
Answer:
$4 million
Explanation:
According to former ESPN boxing reporter Dan Rafael, Fury and Wilder were contractually guaranteed $5 million each in their second bout but ended up earning more than $25 million apiece. Wilder earned a disclosed purse of $4 million in their first fight while Fury earned $3 million, according to SportsJoe.
Answer: DEDUCTIVE PROCESS BASED ON TESTABLE AND MEASURABLE EVENTS.
Explanation: Scientific method can be defined as a method of discovering knowledge about the natural world based on making falsifiable predictions (hypotheses), testing them empirically, and developing theories that match known data from repeatable physical experimentation.
Simply put, according to Options B, it is can be paraphrased as, "deductive process based on testable and measurable events".
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
The king condemning his own peaceful actions to be the cause of violence is in complete contradiction to one another. An oddity occurs and the action is in complete contrast to the outcome. One cannot justify that the corresponding actions may have led to the specific outcome. such is also the case in the example:
a; condemning a robbed man for having too much money does in no way justifies the action of robbing. Blaming a source that was done only for the reason of ones own satisfaction.
b; condemning Socrates for his truth to force people to make him drink the hemlock, is as absurd as the above example.
c; condemning Jesus for his devotion to God shows that the intention of the action was completely different but the outcome was in complete contrast.
Answer:
yh dont why I am a student and I dont copy stuff because I scare if I get it wrong so instead I try my best. whether I get it wrong or right at least I tried not copy!
