Answer:
x=3.2
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
(5)
Since ∠EBA = 90° then ∠ABD = 90° ( straight angle ) and
∠ABC + ∠CBD = ∠ABD, that is
2x + 3x - 10 = 90, simplifying
5x - 10 = 90 ( add 10 to both sides )
5x = 100 ( divide both sides by 5 )
x = 20, thus
∠ABC = 2x = 2 × 20 = 40°
∠CBD = 3x - 10 = (3 × 20) - 10 = 60 - 10 = 50°
(6)
4x - 18 = 3x + 7 ( vertical angles are congruent )
Subtract 3x from both sides
x - 18 = 7 ( add 18 to both sides )
x = 25
7y = 5y + 28 ( vertical angles are congruent )
Subtract 5y from both sides
2y = 28 ( divide both sides by 2 )
y = 14
Answer:
See attached picture.
Step-by-step explanation:
See attached picture.
For remaining parts resubmit question.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the given information:
The null and the alternative hypothesis can be well written as:


Given that:
n = 200
x = 135
Alpha ∝ = 0.05 level of significance
Then;
⇒ 
= 200 × 0.6 × (1 -0.6)
= 200 × 0.6 × 0.4
= 48 ≥ 10
The sample proportion 

= 0.675
The test statistics 


Z = 2.165
The P-value = P(Z > 2.165)
= 1 - P(Z < 2.165)
From the z tables
= 1 - 0.9848
= 0.0152
Reject the null hypothesis since P-Value is lesser than alpha. ( i.e. 0.0152 < 0.05).
Thus, there is enough evidence to conclude that the value of the population proportion is greater than 0.6
Answer:
d. Taking larger samples more frequently
Step-by-step explanation:
The alternative that will increase the probability of detecting a shift in the process average is option D.
d. Taking larger samples more frequently
.