Answer:
The right approach will be "Social
".
Explanation:
- Social neuroscience seems to have been important for understanding how social identity theory happens without depending on self-report measures, rather than analyzing significant differences action which always consists of people come across differences between social classes.
- Physiological theories and approaches are used to reassure but mostly optimize interpretations about social structures as well as behavior.
Based on the given assertion and reason, we can conclude that Wildlife is very important for biodiversity (c) If the assertion is true but reason is false.
<h3>What is an Assertion?</h3>
This refers to the statement that is written in order to make a claim about something that would require proof.
Hence, we can see that based on the given assertion about the importance of both wildlife and natural vegetation, there is truth in it, but Wildlife is very important for bio diversity, which means that option C is correct.
Read more about statements and assertions here:
brainly.com/question/892903
#SPJ1
Answer: The strength of the Neuropsychological approach is that "IT FOCUSES ON HUMAN BRAIN DAMAGED PATIENT". therefore the study of damaged human brain is the strength of the Neuropsychological approach.
The weaknesses of the Neuropsychological approach is that "IT USES A PREVIOUS CASE STUDY TO FOCUS ON HUMAN BRAIN DAMAGE". This means that he uses a previous case to conclude the solution of a recent brain damage.
Explanation: Neuropsychology is the study of psychological effect of a damaged brain in patient suffering from brain damage. It aim is to benefit the patient, by using previous case to study each case. It usually deals with case studies and quasi experimental.
Because it's optimum objective is to benefit it's patient, we can say that it's strength is stronger than its weakness.
The Inuit and Lakota tribes are similar because they both traveled by foot. They also both used animal skins for clothing and warmth.
~Hope I helped~
<span>Lowered cardio-respiratory fitness is one of the best predictors. By not being in shape and having a weakened heart and lungs, one stands less of a chance of surviving issues that arise in these systems. Including a small amount of exercise in one's routine can alleviate many of the risks inherent with this lack of fitness.</span>
