That statement is True.
When a minor driving a car, they held on the same standard as an adult in term of the driving process and mechanism.
But the main difference between adult and minor driving is that adult shall always present in every minor driving. The mistakes that the minor did during the driving shall be held accountable towards the adult.
Answer:
The disorder is agoraphobia, the experience is a panic attack.
Explanation:
The fear of situations where the person believes that the environment they are in is somehow unsafe and they cannot escape it. The environment can be any place it might be anything outside a person's home.
Here, Mr. Belshy cannot leave a certain region near his house and does not want to experience the same situation in a car or bus. Hence Mr. Belshy has agoraphobia and the thing he experiences is a panic attack.
Jasmine has an in group bias. A person who exhibits an in group bias has the thought of favoring his or her group of where he or she belongs to and tend to have low or less care towards others who does not belong. It could be seen at Jasmine's action as she ignores people who are not a member of their chess club and only associate with her members.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. established; rewarded.
Explanation:
Both Watson and Skinner researched behavior and conducted different studies regarding it.
Let's look at both perspectives:
- Classical Conditioning (Watson): it aims to establish an association between a stimulus and a response in order to produce that response and behavior in the individual.
- Operant Conditioning (Skinner): it focuses on rewards in order to develop an individual's response and behavior.
Watson argued a particular behavior is established and Skinner argued a particular behavior is rewarded.
When contrasting life-course persistent offenders with adolescent-limited offenders, researchers agree that: the causes and consequences of the two are very different.
One of the strongest correlates of crime is age, with a common empirical finding of an adolescent rise and peak of offending. One theory in particular, Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, advances a specific hypothesis for the age–crime relationship, with a focus on a specific typology of offenders, adolescence-limited who offend for specific reasons during adolescence. This chapter reviews the adolescence-limited hypothesis relevant empirical research, and concludes with summary statements, challenges to Moffitt’s adolescence-limited hypothesis, and directions for future research.
There are other theories that have been developed to explain the rise and peak of adolescent offending. Patterson (1997) set out a learning model in which decreases in parents monitoring and supervision during adolescence lead adolescents to offend. Another explanation is Agnew’s (2003) integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Recalling that adolescents are given only some adult privileges and responsibilities, Agnew believes that this has important effects on increasing delinquency among adolescents, including a decline in supervision increased social and academic demands participation in a larger, more diverse peer-oriented social world an increase in the desire for adult privileges, and reduced ability to cope in a legitimate manner and an increase in the disposition to cope in an illegitimate (delinquency/crime) manner to attain the adult privileges and goods they want
Learn more about contrasting life-course persistent offenders
brainly.com/question/6258097
#SPJ4
