Answer:
high-context; low-context
Explanation:
Audience members who place more importance on nonverbal than verbal messages from a speaker might be from high-context cultures.
People from high-context cultures have highly collectivistic beliefs. Here mutual respect and businesses are done by building up relationships with each other and maintains respectful communication. People from High context cultures belief in interpersonal relationships. They give more importance to non verbal communications in the form of body language and gestures, behaviors and character.
Whereas those placing more emphasis on what was said than the nonverbal messages might be from low-context cultures.
In low context cultures, a lot of information is exchange through direct talks and communication. People from low context cultures follow direct rules and maintains standards. They are task oriented and have short term relationship.
Thus the answer is "high-context" and "low-context".
Answer:
Continuity
Stage/Discontinuity
Explanation:
In psychology, there are different models used to explain the way people develop and go through changes in their lifespan.
According to the continuity model of development, changes and development are view as a continuous process that is gradual and cumulative. For example, when a child learns a new ability he gradually acquires the necessary skills in a continuous process.
On the other side, there is the discontinuity model of development, also known as stage model. According to this model, development consists on different stages. This model believes that people go through different stage that are qualitatively different from each other and they are not in a continuous non stop process but rather they take place in periods of rapid and abrupt change separated from each other by periods of little change.
In this example, <u>Dr. Johan believes in the model that says that changes occur at a relatively regular pace,</u> this would be the Continuity model.
On the other hand, <u>Dr. Ziback believes in the model that says that there are periods of rapid and abrupt change separated by periods of very little change, </u>this would be the Discontinuiy/Stage model.
In China from very early times, men have been seen as the core of the family. The ancestors to whom a Shang or Zhou dynasty king made sacrifices were his patrilineal ancestors, that is, his ancestors linked exclusively through men (his father’s father, his father’s father’s father, and so on). When women enter the early historical record, it is often because they caused men problems. Some women schemed to advance their own sons when their husband had sons by several women. Women’s loyalties were often in question. In 697 BCE, for instance, the daughter of one of the most powerful ministers in the state of Zheng learned from her husband that the ruler had ordered him to kill her father. After her mother advised her that “All men are potential husbands, but you have only one father,” she told her father of the plot, and he promptly killed her husband. The ruler of Zheng placed the blame on the husband for foolishly confiding in his wife. Taken together, accounts of these sorts present a mixed picture of women and the problems they presented for men in the nobility. The women in their lives were capable of loyalty, courage, and devotion, but also of intrigue, manipulation, and selfishness.
thers more but ill save you the reading hope this helped . :)
D. The appearance of the odd people
Relational responding is the process of responding to one stimulus or event in light of another. changes in stimulus functions Based on how a stimulus interacts with other inputs, a person's response to a stimulus can be altered or transformed.
Relational responding, also known as a relational reaction, occurs when an organism responds to a stimulus without taking into account the situational context, instead acting as though it were in response to another stimulus. When stimuli are related to one another, relational responding takes place, and conditioning may result from the associations that result from the relating of the stimuli.
A relational response example is provided in a paper by Ian Stewart and John McElwee. When the colour red is used, an animal is taught to select a vertical line, and when the colour green is used, it selects a horizontal line. Vertical-red and Horizontal-green are the two unidirectional relational responses that result from this. By linking the stimuli and reacting in accordance with the relationship, this association results.
Learn more about Relational responding here
brainly.com/question/3808494
#SPJ4
