All categories

2 years ago

The 2 main support rods for a barbeque grill are each 7.5 cm from the centre of the

Mathematics

1 answer:

sukhopar [10]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

58.1 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The length of each support rod can be found using the Pythagorean theorem. The geometry can be modeled by a right triangle, such that the distance from centre is one leg and half the length of the rod is the other leg of a triangle with hypotenuse equal to the radius of the grill.

<h3>Pythagorean theorem</h3>

The theorem tells us that the sum of the squares of the legs of a right triangle is the square of the hypotenuse. For legs a, b and hypotenuse c, this is ...

c² = a² +b²

<h3>application</h3>

For the geometry of the grill, we can define a=7.5 and c=30. Then b will be half the length of the support rod.

30² = 7.5 +b²

b² = 900 -56.25 = 843.75

b = √843.75 ≈ 29.0473

The length of each support rod is twice this value, so ...

rod length = 2b = 2(29.0473) = 58.0947

Each support rod is about 58.1 cm long.

You might be interested in

The ratio of two sums of money are 4:5. the first sum is $6. what is the second?

BabaBlast [244]

7.5
Cross multiply (4•x) and (5•6) and get 30=4x
X=7.5

4 0

3 years ago

What is the percent of 45/100?

myrzilka [38]

45/100 is 4,500% 2/5 is 40% 18/40 is 45% 15/25 is 60%

5 0

3 years ago

We are conducting a hypothesis test to determine if fewer than 80% of ST 311 Hybrid students complete all modules before class.

Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer:

$z=\frac{0.881 -0.8}{\sqrt{\frac{0.8(1-0.8)}{110}}}=2.124$

Null hypothesis: $p\geq 0.8$

Alternative hypothesis: $p < 0.8$

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z$

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.

Be Careful with the system of hypothesis!

If we conduct the test with the following hypothesis:

Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.8$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.8$

$p_v =P(Z>2.124)=0.013$

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation

n=110 represent the random sample taken

X=97 represent the students who completed the modules before class

$\hat p=\frac{97}{110}=0.882$ estimated proportion of students who completed the modules before class

$p_o=0.8$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha$ represent the significance level

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v{/tex} represent the p value (variable of interest) 2) Concepts and formulas to use We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is less than 0.8 or 80%: Null hypothesis:[tex]p\geq 0.8$

Alternative hypothesis: $p < 0.8$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

3) Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.881 -0.8}{\sqrt{\frac{0.8(1-0.8)}{110}}}=2.124$

4) Statistical decision

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a left tailed test the p value would be:

$p_v =P(Z$

Be Careful with the system of hypothesis!

If we conduct the test with the following hypothesis:

Null hypothesis: $p\leq 0.8$

Alternative hypothesis: $p > 0.8$

$p_v =P(Z>2.124)=0.013$

So the p value obtained was a very low value and using the significance level assumed $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

5 0

4 years ago

A garden hose emits 9 quarts of water in 6 seconds how much did the water emit in 10seconds

jarptica [38.1K]

Answer:

In 10 seconds, the garden hose will emit 15 quarts of water.

Step-by-step explanation:

The amount of water emitted by the garden hose over time can be expressed as a ratio: 9/6, or 9 quarts of water for every 6 seconds of time. We can then simplify this ratio to 3/2, or 3 quarts of water for every 2 seconds of time. Since the ratio will remain constant, or the same, over time, we can set up an equivalent ratio, or fraction to find the amount of water emitted in 10 seconds: 3/2 = x/10. We look at the denominators and see that 2 x 5 = 10. In order to make the ratios equivalent, we would also multiply the numerator by 5: 3 x 5 = 15, which gives us the amount of water emitted in 10 seconds.

7 0

3 years ago

5. A hairstylist charges $15 for an

Rashid [163]

Answer:

you cut off some of the problem

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago