If this is a true or false, I would say the answer would be true. If a business wants to find out the overall opinion of customers, they would need several opinions from many customers. If they only asked a couple, and those were the only people who did not like the certain item, then the grading or whatever of the certain item would be wrong because most people actually did like the certain item. If this is not a true or false, then I do not know how to answer this question because there is not enough information. I hope this answer helps! :D
<span>The answer is Peter Berger's concept of debunking. It means to expose the falseness. Peter Berger is a author of Social Construction. Humanity is the main one in the sociology and it place the discipline close to the humanities like literature, history and philosophy etc. Based on humanity the unmasking assumptions are debunking.</span>
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>rumination </em><em> </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em><u>Rumination, </u></em><em>in psychology, is described as an individual's focused attention related to the symptoms of his or her distress and its related possible consequences and causes and is opposite to its specific solutions that are associated with the "response style theory" which was discovered by</em><em><u> Nolen-Hoeksema during 1998.</u></em>
<em><u>The correct answer for the question above is rumination.</u></em>
The third one on the right
Answer:
The constitution limits the powers of the executive branch because the separation of powers divides the powers of the government into three separate branches and restrains any branch to have too much power. The executive branch can veto any law brought to it.
Explanation: