Answer:
Explanation:
1. I will first Identify the claim. The claim is sometimes stated in a very general way, then elaborated on throughout the essay.
2. I will next examine the claim for qualifiers; words like "some," "many," "most of the time," etc. It can sometimes be damaging to an argument to omit qualifiers, particularly if there are also no exceptions provided. It is up to you as a reader to determine whether the writer's unqualified claim is damaging to this particular argument.
3. I will then examine the claim for an exception. After looking for qualifying words in the claim, the next step is to determine what the writer considers to be the situations in which the writer's claim doesn't apply. In other words, it is necessary to identify any exceptions the writer makes to her claim.
There exists the same question that has the following choices.
<span>A. She would have settled down and married Lud Simms sooner than she did.
B. She would have realized that she needed to change the way she interacted with men.
C. She and Irene would have become friends because they both dated Dexter.
D. She would never have fallen in love with anyone and remained unmarried.
</span>
The correct answer is letter C. <span>She and Irene would have become friends because they both dated Dexter. </span>
Answer:
c
Explanation: BECAUSE THE ANWSER IS C
Answer:
act that has lasting consequences for the abducted child, the custodial ... family abduction and empower the reader to thoughtfully assist in the immediate ... The abducting family member transports the child out of state.
