<u>Answer:</u> Consolidation
<u>Explanation:</u>
Courts have the authority to consolidate the cases which have common concern. Consolidated case also does not mean the court will not hear each appeal separately. As the facts of the case are similar that they have not received their prepaid wedding gowns due to the bankruptcy of the bridal store single hearing is placed by the court.
The consolidated cases at first remain the same way but the arguments of the attorneys may diverge the case while appealing. The disappointed brides should receive their compensation at once from the failed store here.,
<span>The answer would be false. Alcohol and Drug abuse certainly physically affects only the user, but when it comes to mental, emotional, and financial aspects alcohol and drug abusers affect the people around them, their families, and in extension, society also. That is why alcohol and drug abuse is considered a public health issue as it affects many people apart from the user himself/herself. </span>
Answer:
The issue is whether Joe is liable to pay for Bob to Avarice Bank or not.
Joe should prevail.
Explanation:
The original contract is between bank and Bob and in that contract Joe is not involved. Secondly payment on someone' behalf always has to be a written contract.
According to UCC, suretyships have to be written for them to be enforceable. This is mentioned in Statute of Frauds. It clearly states that any gurantee by thrid party for payment of debts has to be in writing.
The answer is letter a, cosigner. Mark is a cosigner is someone who is in charged of the other person's debt when that person he's in signed with wasn't able to meet the requirements or fail to pay or comply. That is why Mark is considered to be a cosigner of Gabriel if Gabriel fails to comply to pay the loan and Mark is in charged to settle it if Gabriel fails to do so.