Answer:
at the end
Explanation:
Adjusting entries are made at the end of an accounting period after a trial balance is prepared to adjust the revenues and expenses for the period in which they occurred.
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:

It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,

4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.
Answer:
The correct answer is number (1): double indemnity provision.
Explanation:
A double indemnity provision is added in life insurance to double the amount the beneficiaries of the policyholder receive in front of his or her death in an accident. Double indemnity provision does not cover events in which the policyholder dies because of natural reasons or when those individuals had hazardous jobs. Premiums are higher with a double indemnity provision.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
Both steps give candidates a realistic preview of the job.
Explanation:
When a manager from another restaurant says to you, "I’ve heard that Barcelona has a three-step hiring process. Candidates first have an interview in which Scott does most of the talking, and then they visit Barcelona restaurants and record their impressions. This seems like a lot of work. The basic purpose and logic behind these two steps is to give candidates a realistic preview of the job. With the help of these two steps in which candidates first have an interview with Scott and then visit Barcelona restaurants to get their impressions recorded, candidates can have a realistic, practical and genuine preview of the job. Candidates can come to know about the expectations which they can have from the job and the reality so they will not be surprised and shocked at all if their expectations does not meet the actual job's conditions and specifications.