Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
Answer:
acquisition
Explanation:
Acquisition: In psychology, the term "acquisition" was explained by a psychologist named Ivan Pavlov and is defined as the very first stage related to learning in the classical conditioning process through which a specific response is being established.
In other words, the acquisition is described as a period whereby a particular stimulus tends to trigger a specific conditioned response.
Example: In classical conditioning, when a dog begins to salivate after getting associated with the sound of a bell.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the "acquisition" period.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
they are both third world and high poverty rate only makes sense if its B
Answer:
Explanation:
To produce good quality
To believe your own country
To reduce poverty
To create job opportunity
Answer:
B because the first one is called tariffs.
