The answer would be 24 pints
Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
Answer:
8 mangoes
Step-by-step explanation:
1) lets create 2 systems of inequalities
where m=# of mangoes
p=# of peaches
so m+p≥15 and 1m+0.5p≤15
lets substitute "13" in the m+p inequality to see how many mangoes dylan can buy:
m+(13)≥15
subtract "13" from both sides:
m≥2
now we substitute "13" in the other inequality:
m+0.5(13)≤15
m+6.5≤15
subtract 6.5 from both sides:
m≤8.5
m≥2 and m≤8.5
seeing our restriction, we can buy 8 mangoes (since we can't have 1/2 a mango)
hope this helps!
Answer:
Whole Number : 6
Integers: -6 and 6
Rational Number: -6.0 and -6/1
Irrational Number: -Infinity or -0