The answer is "<span>by writing an amicus curiae brief".
</span>
Companion of the court, or amicus curiae, briefs are regularly documented in re-appraising cases heard by the U.S. Supreme Court and state supreme courts, and also intermediate courts of bid. What's more, there is significant confirmation that amicus briefs have impact: Appellate courts regularly refer to them in issuing their choices.
Based on the description of the type of relationship Rhona and Jerome have, we can say that they have a<u> companionate love. </u>
A companionate love is where:
- Partners in a sexual relationship view each other as equals
- Partners support each other and share their aspirations and feelings
- There isn't necessarily any passion between partners
Rhona and Jerome support each other and share their feelings. They do not however, have any real passion between each other. This fits the description of companionate love.
In conclusion, Rhona and Jerome have companionate love.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/20487028. </em>
<span>Absolute advantage is the ability to produce a good or a service at a lower production cost than competitors. Comparative advantage is the ability to produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than competitors.
Absolute advantage refers to the ability to produce a good more efficiently than a competitor, which means at a lower cost. Comparative advantage means that, relative to the cost of producing other products, you can produce the good at a lower cost. This is also known as the opportunity cost. </span><span />
