Answer:
The recent loss of 440 manufacturing jobs at Ford Australia has generated a lot of debate about the long-term viability of the Australian car industry, and manufacturing in general. This debate has included arguments that manufacturing is important and needs more government support. It has also seen some commentators argue that Australian’s have no right to expect jobs in manufacturing.
While most of this debate has focused on the automotive manufacturing sector, there is a wider question that needs to be answered. This relates to the issue of whether it is feasible for an advanced economy to grow and prosper without a manufacturing sector?
Explanation:
Answer:
Dollar profit loss = $3
Holding period return = negative 9%
Explanation:
In order to find the dollar profit or loss return we will add the dividend and selling price because that the dividend plus the selling price is the cash that Travis receives or the positive cash and we will subtract the buying price from it because it is the negative cash flow. So we will add all the positive cash flows and subtract negative cash flow from it in order to find the dollar profit loss or return.
Selling price = 27.65
Dividend = 0.85
Selling price + Dividend= 28.5
Selling price = 31.50
Dollar profit loss or return = 28.50-31.5=-3
Loss= $3
In order to find the holding period return we will divide add the dividend and selling price , subtract buying price from it and then divide it by buying price.
(27.65+0.85-31.5)/31.5= -0.09 = -9%
Holding period return = negative 9%
Answer:
$24,220
Explanation:
After tax cashflow formula as follows;
AT cashflow = Income before taxes(1- tax) + annual depreciation amount
Depreciation amount is added back because even though it is an expense deducted to arrive at the income before tax, it is not an actual cash outflow.
Annual depreciation amount = $200,000/ 20 = $10,000
AT cashflow = 18,000*(1-0.21) + 10,000
= 14,220 + 10,000
= 24,220
Therefore, Mariposa’s expected cash flow after taxes per year is $24,220
The scope of practice regulations for <u>Nurse Practitioners (NP)</u> should be reconsidered.
Across the states, there is substantial variation in the
scope of practice permitted to NP’s. Some states allow NP’s to provide care
independently without the need for physician collaboration or supervision, while
other states do not allow NP’s to do so. Thus there is a great need to align
the regulations set for NP’s.
Answer:
A. $1,517,648 thousand
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of goods sold using the FIFO method is shown below:
= Cost of goods sold under LIFO - (Ending LIFO reserves - Beginning LIFO reserves)
= $1,517,397 - ($4,345 - $4,094)
= $1,517,648
We simply applied the above formula so that the cost of goods sold using the FIFO method could come
All other information i.e given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
