Answer: it's a convincing evidence of a casual link
Explanation:
It's recorded that 97% of accidents that affected bicyclist greatly were because they weren't putting on their helmet. A state ignoring putting laws to implement the enforcement of the helmet rule is proving a convincing evidence of a casual link because if the rules are enforced fatality won't be much.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
c. is correct
Explanation:
their distinct appraisals of the situation
Surely the distinct point of view of them about a test.
The ability of minority Views to be heard even if they may be unpopular or distasteful to many citizens is constitutional proctored as part of which of the following selection
Answer:
People in Hanoi started clipping live rats' tails and releasing them back into the sewers to breed. ... It worked to some extent, but it also gave many indigenous peoples intellectual tools to resist French imperialism. Colonial subjects formed networks and shared new ideas about revolution and resistance.
Explanation:
