Answer:
Social influence theory
Explanation:
Kelman's social influence theory suggests that the attitude, behavior and personal belief of a person are based on the concepts of compliance, identification, and internalization. Th resultant actions are therefore a shadow of these processes and concepts. Here, it is suggested that hypnosis involves inducing someone to enact the role of a hypnotic subject which involves the idea of social compliance and then social identification and internalization that they are being hypnotized. Hence, the theory says that hypnosis is a result of external social factors.
The answer for this question is C. The Domino Theory. This theory states that if a country came under communist rule, its neighboring countries and regions would follow as well. This theory is what the US used as a reason to intervene in the different affairs of various countries to stop or prevent communism from spreading.
1 . - It destroy the habitat of many living organisms.
- It poisoned the air due to high CO2
- It killed the organisms and disrupt the ratio
2. It's better to use .org which indicate that the research are solely for that specific purpose
3. Create an earthquake detector that could predict the earthquake before it happened
Arguments that appear to be legitimate but are really founded on poor reasoning are known as logical fallacies. They could be the product of unintentional thinking mistakes or purposely employed to deceive others.
Taking logical fallacies at its value might cause to base our conclusions on weak arguments and result in poor decisions. Some of the text relies on the effectiveness of logical fallacies are :
- The Bandwagon Fallacy: Bandwagon fallacies, such as "three out of four individuals think X brand toothpaste cleans teeth best," are something that most of us expect to see in advertising; nonetheless, this fallacy may easily find its way into regular meetings and conversations.
- The Appeal to Authority Fallacy: Having an authoritative person support your claim might be a strong supplement to an existing argument, but it cannot be the main tenet of your case. Something is not always real just because a powerful person thinks it to be true.
- The False Dilemma Fallacy: The false dilemma fallacy claims that there are only two possible endings, which are mutually incompatible, rather than understanding that most (if not all) topics may be conceived of on a spectrum of options and perspectives.
- The Hasty Generalization Fallacy: This mistake happens when someone makes broad assumptions based on insufficient data. In other words, they ignore plausible counterarguments and make assumptions about the truth of a claim that has some, but insufficient, supporting evidence.
- The Slothful Induction Fallacy: This fallacy happens when there is enough logical evidence to conclude something is true, but someone refuses to admit it, instead attributing the result to coincidence or something completely unrelated.
- The Correlation Fallacy: If two things seem to be linked, it doesn't always follow that one of them caused the other indisputablelly. Even while it can seem like a straightforward fallacy to recognise, it can be difficult to do so in actual practise, especially if you truly want to uncover a link between two pieces of information to support your claim.
To learn more logical fallacies refer
brainly.com/question/18094137
#SPJ4
Answer:
With the promulgation of its constitution in 2015, Nepal replaced a unitary government with a federal system of government. This process has made Nepal a federal democratic republic governed with three levels of government: a federal level, seven provinces and 753 local government.
I hope it help you,
God blessed you.
Follow me for more answer
