Answer:
In the given case study, the reliability of internet sources can not be trusted and possibilities are that such sources are biased.
Explanation:
Poaching is an illegal act of hunting or trapping of animals. So, internet sources that the grade 4 learners came across can not be trusted. The reliability of the blog can not be trusted as it supports the poaching system and confirms it to be a source of funding to animals. Since poaching an illegal act a blog that claims to support such an act would be unreliable and biased.
<u>For the fact, all internet sources can not be relied upon because not all of them assures good quality of information, their accuracy can not be trusted. Some sources are biased also. This problem arises because now people have access to post anything on the internet whether reliable or not</u>.
I would have to say C, <span>The French converted many Native Americans to Catholicism but allowed the Native Americans to maintain their culture
</span>
When Jordan chooses communication intended to bring the greatest good to the greatest number of people over time, he is using the <u>"Utilitarian Approach" </u>principle of ethical communication.
The Utilitarian Approach evaluates an activity as far as its results or results; i.e., the net advantages and expenses to all partners on an individual level. It endeavors to accomplish the best useful for the best number while making minimal measure of damage or keeping the best measure of affliction. It holds that each element's advantages ought to be thought about similarly when settling on the choice, and this incorporates those of different species since they additionally are equipped for suffering.
The answer is C because I remember this from when I did it when I was younger
Answer: (A)
Dr. Pulaski is likely to find that approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial.
Explanation:
Solomon Asch conducted an experiment to find out to what extent people conform to group pressure.
He set up the experiment to include a single participant and seven confederates in a group. (A confederate is an accomplice of a researcher who is placed intentionally within an experiment by the researcher, so he can manipulate the experiment in his favor).
Each confederate was to give the same wrong answer to a certain question asked, while the participant was to provide his answer last.
Asch then observed if the single participant would tailor his answer according to the wrong answers provided by the confederates, or would provide the accurate answer.
Asch found out that from 12 trials conducted, "75% (three-quarters) of participants conformed to wrong answers provided at least once", while 25% did not conform at all.
He also discovered that on average of the trials carried out, one-third of the participants went along with the incorrect answer provided by the confederates.
Asch had also set up a control experiment with only a single participant and no confederates.
From the control experiment, he realized that less than 1% provided the wrong answer to the question asked.
