I’m pretty sure it would be just E and F
Answer:
Given a square ABCD and an equilateral triangle DPC and given a chart with which Jim is using to prove that triangle APD is congruent to triangle BPC.
From the chart, it can be seen that Jim proved that two corresponding sides of both triangles are congruent and that the angle between those two sides for both triangles are also congruent.
Therefore, the justification to complete Jim's proof is "SAS postulate"
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
$1150
Step-by-step explanation:
To be honest, this is the type of question I straight up solve in my head. Sorry for the no explanation.
The correct answer is: [C]: " c(x) = –8x²<span> + 3x – 5 " .
_________________________________________________________
The quadratic function takes the form of:
_________________________________________________________
" f(x) = ax</span>² + bx + c " .
_________________________________________________________
Answer choice: [C]: " c(x) = –8x² + 3x – 5 " ;
is the only answer choice provided that takes that form of the quadratic function:
" f(x) = ax² + bx + c " :
in which: " a = -8 " ; " b = 3 " ; " c = -5 " .
____________________________________________________
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
please mark brainiest hope it works out for you
