<u>An increase in supply</u><u> means the supply curve has shifted to the right, while </u><u>an increase in quantity supplied </u><u>refers to a movement along a given supply curve in response to an increase in price.</u>
What would shift a supply curve down and to the right?
- In contrast, a drop in input costs will cause the supply curve to move to the right. Technology.
- An increase in technology will shift the supply curve to the right. Conversely, a decrease in technology will shift the supply curve to the left.
What does it mean when the supply curve shifts to the right?
- When demand is constant and supply is increasing, the supply curve moves to the right, creating an intersection where quantity and prices are lower.
- On the other hand, a negative change in supply causes the curve to move to the left, raising prices and lowering quantity.
Which would cause a shift in the supply curve ?
- When a change is brought about by a source other than price, the supply curve shifts.
Learn more about supply curve
brainly.com/question/14925184
#SPJ4
Answer:
please refer to attachment for more explanation
Explanation:
a. a. Since both goods are complementary goods an increase in the price of cream cheese would cause equilibrium price and quantity of bagel to decrease.
b. If the price of the substitute good croissant decreases then the demand for bagel will fall since croissant is obviously cheaper therefore demand curve will shift downward and price and quantity will fall.
c. Lower income of the consumer would make the demand for the inferior good bagel to rise. Demand curve will shift upwards and price and quantity will rise.
Answer:
Right now marcantuone and robert gieson ought not be held at risk for what the drycleaner inhabitants did.Because there was no release of perilous substance during their ownership.The chlorinated dissolvable pollution issue right now the aftereffect of dry cleaning activity led preceding the condemnee's acquisition of the property.There was no proof of a release of unsafe substance during the time of condemnee's ownership.The sullying was not found until after the condemner had procured the title to the property in the judgement activity.
As indicated by the spill demonstration the obligation is vested on a condemner who bought debased property and didn't attempt any assessment or examination at the hour of procurement.
1. Friedrich von Hayek------------Less government intervention gives people more economic freedom.
To Hayek, less government intervention implied more economic freedom. He trusted that when individuals are allowed to pick, the economy runs all the more proficiently. In the United States, the most grounded supporters of Hayek's thoughts were a gathering of business analysts at the University of Chicago. Known as the "Chicago School of Economics," this inexactly shaped, informal gathering of financial specialists was for the most part connected with free market libertarianism. The name alludes to financial specialists who got their tutoring in the Economics Department at the University of Chicago. To date, almost 50% of all Nobel Prizes in Economics have been won by analysts with connections to Chicago.
2. Milton Friedman---------Government should not control the money supply.
Milton Friedman saw the 1920s as years of indispensable and sustainable growth in the economy. Amid this period the Federal Reserve outstandingly extended the cash supply. This development was not reflected in an expansion in the normal cost level, on the grounds that fiscal powers were killed by simultaneous increments in efficiency.
3. John Maynard Keynes----------Government intervention is necessary for stability.
John Maynard Keynes made the hypothetical contentions for another kind of monetary system: government intervention used to smooth out the business cycle. Keynes died in 1946, yet his thoughts made the Keynesian school of financial aspects and prompted the improvement of macroeconomics. Keynes' belief system overwhelmed the financial worldview from 1945 until the late 1970s. As indicated by Keynes, free markets don't generally contain self-adjusting components; some of the time government intervention is important to limit downturns and advance development. He trusted that without state help, the blasts and busts in the business cycle could winding wild.
4. Adam Smith------------Competition is a regulatory force.
A market economy is a monetary framework in which people claim the greater part of the assets - land, work, and capital - and control their utilization through willful choices made in the commercial center. It is a framework in which the legislature assumes a little role. In this kind of economy, two powers - self-interest and competition - assume a critical job. The role of self interest and competition was depicted by financial specialist Adam Smith more than 200 years prior and still fills in as basic to our comprehension of how showcase economies work.
