The statement that is true about this scenario on calling for the arrest of a person for hate speech is that Negative expression is not protected, but there are limits to punishment for it.
<h3>What is true of negative expression?</h3>
In the United States, a person's freedom of expression is protected but there are limits to this. Those limits come into play when the person engages in negative expression where they call for harm to be done to another person.
While these negative expression rights are not protected, there are still limits to punishments that can be imposed on a person. These limits are based on the crime that was committed by the person's expression of negative speech.
Find out more on negative speech at brainly.com/question/14190365.
#SPJ1
Answer with Explanation:
National security and liberty have always been related to each other. Neither is in opposition to the other. Balance between the two is necessary. When a country makes policies in order to make a country secure (such as being secure against foreign attacks), it doesn't mean it is lessening the effectiveness of liberty. It is actually supporting liberty and is also securing it for the future generation.
<u>It is said that any threat to the country such as America (or its national security) is also considered a threat to the nation's liberty</u>.
Thus, this explains the answer.
Answer:
They suggest that Roger give out free hot dogs,which are bought from their cousin's supermarket.
They support Kelly's push for vegetarian options in the cafeteria, so that if Kelly is elected, she will get the school to buy "Harrison's Burgers" brand veggie burgers from their dad's company.
I beleive that they should declare martial law and arrest those who do anything illegally. basically put soldiers instead of cops on the streets
