Answer:
An affirmative defense of <u><em>Duress</em></u> implies an accused committed a criminal act in response to another’s volition (or will). Put simply, the defendant argues that someone made them commit the crime.
Explanation:
A duress can be described as a kind of affirmative defense. In this type of defense, the lawyer or attorney can argue that a defendant did something illegal due to extraordinary situations like somebody threatening them to do the illegal act. The attorney fights that in such a scenario, the defendant should not be held accountable for the act. Duress is a defense which can be used to justify an illegal act as the evidence shows that the culprit has caused the illegal act.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The public facilities, water supply, electric supply, and health services available in my area are considerably decent, although there is always room to improve.
The local government has invested some money in the renovation of public facilities, trying to benefit the people that in the past had suffered from a lack of decent public services.
Public facilities in the city's downtown were the object of some refurbishing. They can host more people. The water supply has no problem because most of the water is taken from a lake close to our town. So in that regard, we have no problems. Now, talking about the health services, they are very expensive and hospitals are not in the best condition. Indeed, people prefer to go to see doctors in other towns. Here is where politicians have too much room for improvement.
Finally, about electric supply, the town has some agreements with other communities to share the services of a major power plant in the area. So no major problems here.
Answer:
c. The buyer did not have the right to cancel the second shipment, because the defects in the first shipment did not substantially impair the value of the entire contract.
Explanation:
In this case, it involves the installment contract. It means that the contract requires deliveries in two different lots and also sale of the goods. Therefore under the Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, the buyer may wish to declare total breach of the installment contract, if the defects substantially impairs the entire contract's value.
In the context, the manufacturer corrected the first defected shipment of stain. The manufacturer offered to cure the defective first shipment to the hardware owner. Thus the first shipment's defect in stain does not impair the whole contract's value.
Hence the correct option is (c).
Answer:
The best option would be 4. A researcher proposes to join a moderated support group for cancer survivors posing as a survivor. She plans to insert comments to see how the members respond.
Explanation:
Explanation:
no the supreme court justices are appointed by the president. they go through questioning and they get voted in by the senate.
hope this helps
plz mark brainliest
