Answer:
The correct answer is
: Yes, the offer was revoked by Katherine.
Explanation:
Even if Paul replied Katherine with the acceptance to the first offer, he used a different means of communication to do that -<em>e-mail v. mail</em>. In addition, Katherine sent the revoke by mail -<em>as in the initial offer</em>- before Paul sent his e-mail. So, there is enough proof on Katherine's end that she didn't want to proceed with the offer before Paul confirmed his agreement on the terms. In that sense, Katherine did revoke the initial order.
Answer: Managerial Accounting
Explanation:
Managerial accounting refers to the preparation of reports and analysis from the company's accounting information to enable managers decide the ways to go with a company.
This type of accounting is for internal use and so is not subject to the kind of scrutiny that financial accounting gets from accounting bodies such as IASB and the FASB.
An example would be the Supply Manager may ask for a report to be made showing them the increase in supply costs for the past decade from their preferred supplier to enable them make a decision on if to find a new supplier.
Answer:
Letter c is correct. <em><u>Higher than the total output that would be produced if the market were a monopoly but lower than the total output that would be produced if the market were perfectly competitive.</u></em>
Explanation:
An oligopoly is a market situation that occurs when there are a small number of companies that dominate the supply of a particular product or service in a sector of the economy. It can occur naturally or structurally, and the purpose of this market configuration is to have greater competition and price control, so that there is greater profitability.
This scenario is characterized by imperfect competition, which is similar to the monopoly market, but in oligopoly production is higher than in monopoly, because there is more than one supplier of the same product. And production in an oligopoly is lower than in a perfectly competitive scenario where there are many suppliers and none have the ability to affect market price.
Answer:
Red Cross took the right decision by reversing the original decision of diverting the donations. If it had diverted the donations donor will loose trust in the organisation and will not come forward to help. When it maintains a policy of honoring donor intent people will trust it to stand by it and they donated for the victims of the terrorist attack and the donations must be spent on it only. Then the trust of the donors will not fall and if the organisation wants donations for other ancillary operation sit can genuinely ask for donations and there are many people who would be willing to help. This gives both trust and respect and also the cause is served. Hence the decision to reverse the original one is correct and a good move.
