Answer:
Sometimes our justice system can really surprise us. How can a person sue another individual based on arguments that are known to be false? Shouldn't the courts just say no to this kind of lawsuits?
It's plain common sense that the court would dictate that the agreement should be annulled or rescinded based on the mother's fraud attempt or maybe mutual mistake between Michael Jordan and her. Even if they were both convinced that he was the father, after it was proven that he wasn't, the court shouldn't have even wasted its time (and taxpayers money) with this case.
Answer:
$93,000
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
selling cost of the property = $350,000
Earnest money paid = $12,000
Percentage of loan obtained = 70%
Now,
The amount of loan obtained = 70% of $350,000
= $245,000
Therefore,
Amount to be paid by self
= selling cost of the property - amount of loan obtained
= $350,000 - $245,000
= $105,000
Thus,
Additional cash the buyer will have to bring to the closing day
= Amount to be paid by self - Earnest money paid
= $105,000 - $12,000
= $93,000
Answer:
see below
Explanation:
The concept of limited liability is a confirmation that a corporation's assets are liabilities are distinct from those of shareholders. The concepts safeguard the shareholder's private properties should a business fail to meet its obligations.
Limited liability states that the liabilities of a shareholder is limited to the extent of his capital contribution. If the event of a dissolution, a shareholder's losses are capped to the share contribution. Their personal properties cannot be used to pay business debts should the business's assets be inadequate.
Answer:
Hello.
Explanation:
True brain discharge >>> http://mavizion.com
